Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 156

CONTROVERSIAL EXAMPLES FROM THE AYVALIK TAKSIYARHIS CHURCH ABOUT THE ICONOGRAPHICAL STYLE SUGGESTIONS DEVELOPED AFTER 1453

1453 Sonrasında Gelişim Gösteren İkonografik Üslup Önermelerine Ayvalık Taksiyarhis Kilisesi’nden Tartışmalı Örnekler

Pages
239–250
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, since it is not possible to limit the intensive picture program of the church to a single article, the examples that were examined were chosen according to personal preference.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the main problems of iconography, the fact that the artist does articulations without a textual support to a composition is a common feature in Christian iconography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The individuality of artists, which started to show itself with the Renaissance, also manifests itself in the icon production of the Greeks who migrated to various Aegean islands, especially Crete, after leaving Istanbul in 1453.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, since it is not possible to limit the intensive picture program of the church to a single article, the examples that were examined were chosen according to personal preference.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the main problems of iconography, the fact that the artist does articulations without a textual support to a composition is a common feature in Christian iconography. For this reason, it is necessary to make iconographic analysis by examining both apocryphal and canonical texts. However, the fact that these determinations can not always be done in a healthy way or requires a rigorous research process requires that some features can not be detected as canonical or apocryphal, are interpreted to be controversial. The individuality of artists, which started to show itself with the Renaissance, also manifests itself in the icon production of the Greeks who migrated to various Aegean islands, especially Crete, after leaving Istanbul in 1453. This process, which is examined within the scope of the article, tries to convey the developments and changes seen in Christian iconography after 1453 on Ayvalik Taksiyarhis Church dated 1844. This structure, which is the only church that reached Ayvalik with its original paintings, emphasizes this change in the iconography. However, since it is not possible to limit the intensive picture program of the church to a single article, the examples that were examined were chosen according to personal preference.

Özet

İkonografinin temel sorunlarından biri olan, sanatçının, bir esere metinsel dayanağı olmayan eklemeler yapması, Hıristiyan ikonografisinde sıkça rastlanılan bir özelliktir. Bu sebeple, ikonografik çözümleme-nin hem apokrif hem kanonik metinler incelenerek yapılması gerekmektedir. Ancak, bu tespitlerin her zaman sağlıklı bir şekilde yapılamaması veya titiz bir araştırma süreci gerektirmesi, ne kanonik ne de apokrif olarak tespit edilemeyen bazı özelliklerin tartışmalı olarak kaldığı, çözülemediği görülmektedir. Rönesans ile beraber kendini göstermeye başlayan sanatçıların daha özgün üsluplara başvurması ise 1453 sonrası İstanbul’u terk edip başta Girit olmak üzere, çeşitli Ege adalarına göç eden Rumların sür-dürdüğü ikona üretiminde de kendini göstermektedir. Makale kapsamında incelenen bu süreç, 1453 sonrasında yaşanan gelişmelerle Hıristiyan ikonografisinde görülen gelişmeleri ve değişimleri 1844 tarihli Ayvalık Taksiyarhis Kilisesi üzerinden aktarmaya çalışmaktadır. Ayvalık’ın özgün resim prog-ramıyla günümüze ulaşabilmiş tek kilisesi olan bu yapı, içerdiği resimler ile ikonografide yaşanan bu değişimi vurgulamaktadır. Ancak kilisenin yoğun resim programının tek bir makale ile sınırlandırılması mümkün olmadığından incelenen örnekler kişisel tercih doğrultusunda seçilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SABAN, D. E., PEKAK, M. S. (2022). CONTROVERSIAL EXAMPLES FROM THE AYVALIK TAKSIYARHIS CHURCH ABOUT THE ICONOGRAPHICAL STYLE SUGGESTIONS DEVELOPED AFTER 1453. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 156, 239–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/448561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bayraktar, B. 1998. Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e Ayvalık Tarihi, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara.
  2. Bentchev, I. 2004. Griechische und bulgarische Malerbücher - Beiträge zur Kunst des christlichen Ostens, Band 11, Recklinghausen. Brückner, W. 1968. “Kerze”, Lexikon der Christlichen Ikonographie (LCI) – Allgemeine Ikonographie, Herder Verlag, Freiburg, c.2, 508. Chatzidakis, M. 1993. Εικόνες της Κρητικής Τέχνης (Images of Cretan Art), Heraklion. Didron, A. 1845. Manuel d’Iconographie Chrétiene Grecque et Latine, Imprimerie Royal, Paris. Drakopoulou (Δράκοπουλου), E. 2008. Αναλυτικοί πίνακες των ελλήνων ζωγράφων και των έργων τους (1450 - 1850) (Detailed Paintings of Greek Artists and Their Work, 1450-1850), Εθνικό Ίδρυμα Ερευνών (Ε.Ι.Ε.). Ινστιτούτο Νεοελληνικών Ερευνών, Atina. Emmingshaus, J. 1968. “Verkündigung An Maria”, Lexikon der Christlichen Ikonographie (LCI) – Allgemeine Ikonographie, Herder Verlag, Freiburg, c.4, 422-437.
  3. Gouma-Peterson, T. (1971). “The Survival of Byzantinism in 18th Century Greek Painting”, Allen Memorial Art Museum Bulletin,(29,1), 11-61.
  4. Gravgaard, Anne-Mette. 1987. “Change and Continuity in the Post-Byzantine Church Painting”, Jørgen Rasted 60 years, Papers of the Institute of Medieval Latin and Greek, University of Copenhagen Press, Denmark. Hennecke-Schneemelcher. 1959. Neutestamentliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung, Tübingen, c.1, 280-290.
  5. Hetherington, P. 1974. The “Painter’s Manual” of Dionysios of Fourna,London. Holl, O. 1968. “Stern, Sterne”, Lexikon der Christlichen Ikonographie (LCI) – Allgemeine Ikonographie, Herder Verlag, Freiburg, c.4, 214-216.
  6. Ksingopoulos, A. 1936. Μουσείο Μπενάκη - Κατάλογος των εικόνων, Αθήνα. Manafis, K. A. 1990. Sinai: Treasures of the Monastery of Saint Catherin,. Athens. Michaelis, W. 1956. Die Apokryphen Schriften zum neuen Testament, Bremen, 73-95.
  7. Millet, G. 1916. Recherches Sur L’iconographie de l’Evangile Aux XIVe, X et XVIe Siecles D’Apres Les Monuments de Mistra de la Macedonie et du Mont Athos, Paris. Lucchesi-Palli, E. 1968. “Abendmahl”, Lexikon der Christlichen Ikonographie (LCI) – Allgemeine Ikonographie, Herder Verlag, Freiburg, c.1, 10-18. Mylona. 1998. Τα πάθη τα σεπτά ωσ φώτα σωστικά, το θείο πάθοσ σε ικονεσ τησ Ζακύνθου (The passions as the life-saving lights, the divine passions in the wonders of Zakynthos), Atina. Parpulov-Dolgikh-Cowe. 2010. “A Byzantine Text on the Technique of Icon Painting”, Dumberton Oaks Papers, v.64, pp.201-216.
  8. Pfister-Burkhalter, M. 1968. “Li