SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 156

THE COLLECTION OF INTAGLIO AND CAMEO AT HALUK PERK ARCHIVE

Haluk Perk Müzesi İntaglio ve Cameo (Yüzük Taşları) Kolleksiyonu

Onur GÜLBAY
Pages
199–210
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All of the evaluated examples that made up the collection were collected from various regions of Anatolia and participated in the collection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the cameo and intaglio gemstones, carefully preserved for many years in Haluk Perk Museum Collection, have been studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The collection contains 67 pieces in total and a large majority of gems have been engraved in semi-precious stones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All of the evaluated examples that made up the collection were collected from various regions of Anatolia and participated in the collection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the cameo and intaglio gemstones, carefully preserved for many years in Haluk Perk Museum Collection, have been studied. Various types available in semi-precious gemstones largely dated to late Hellenistic and Roman Period. While the most important group in the collection are the gods and goddesses such as Nike (Victoria), Tykhe (Fortuna), Athena (Minerva), Heracles (Hercules), Hermes (Mercury), Aphrodite (Venus), more rarely there are animals, portraits or unidentified standing figures. The collection contains 67 pieces in total and a large majority of gems have been engraved in semi-precious stones. Only 17 gems are made of glass. Typologically majority of gems are cut in oval form, 4 examples are in octagonal shape. All of the evaluated examples that made up the collection were collected from various regions of Anatolia and participated in the collection.

Özet

Bu çalışmada uzun yıllardır başarılı ve özenli bir koleksiyonerlik bilinciyle Haluk Perk tarafından toplanan Cameo ve İntaglio yüzük taşı örnekleri incelenmiştir. Büyük bir çoğunluğu geç Helenistik ve Roma dönemine tarihlendirilen yarı değerli yüzük taşları içerisinde çok çeşitli tiplerle karşılaşmak mümkündür. Koleksiyonu oluşturan eserler içerisinde en önemli grubu Nike(Victoria), Tykhe(Fortuna), Athena(Minerva), Herakles(Hercules), Hermes(Merkür), Aphrodite(Venüs) gibi tanrı ve tanrıça tiple-meleri oluştururken, daha nadir olarak hayvan figürleri, portreler, ya da tanımlanamayan ayakta duran figürler bulunmaktadır. Toplamda 67 adet eserden oluşan koleksiyonun büyük bir çoğunluğu yarı değerli taşlardan oluşurken, 17 adeti ise camdan imal edilmiştir. Üslup bakımından çoğunluğu yuvarlak kesim tekniğiyle biçimlendirilen taşlar oluştururken, 4 adet örnek de oktogonal kesim tekniğinde işlenmiştir. Koleksiyonu oluşturan eserlerin tamamı Anadolu’nun çeşitli bölgelerinden toplanarak koleksiyona katılmış eserlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLBAY, O. (2022). THE COLLECTION OF INTAGLIO AND CAMEO AT HALUK PERK ARCHIVE. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 156, 199–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/448544

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Boardman, J. 1969. Three Greek Gem Masters, the Burlington Magazine, Vol. 111, No. 799. Boardman, J. 1970. Greek gems and finger rings: early Bronze Age to late Classical, London. Faraone, C. 2011.
  2. Text, Image and Medium: the Evolution of Graeco-Roman Magical Gemstones, “Gems of Haven”, Recent Research on Engraved Gemstones in Late Antiquity, c. AD 200–600, Edited by Chris Entwistle and Noël Adams British Museum Research Publication Number 177, 50-62,
  3. London. Golman, A. L. 2002. A Rare Roman Trio, (research notes) Octagonal Gemstones excavated at Gor-dion, volume 44, number 3. Guiraud, H. 1992.
  4. Intaglios from Dura-Europos, Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin, le University Art Gallery Bulletin. Konuk, K. ve M. Arslan 2000. Anadolu Antik Yüzük Taşları ve Yüzükleri, Yüksel Erimtan Koleksiyonu, Ancient Gems And Finger Rings From Asia Minor, Ankara.
  5. Lüle, Ç. 2011. Non-destructive Gemmological Tests for the Identification of Ancient Gems, “Gems of Haven”, Recent Research on Engraved Gemstones in Late Antiquity, c. AD 200–600, Edited by Chris Entwistle and Noël Adams British Museum Research Publication Number 177, 1-4,
  6. London. Molesworth, H. ve M. Henig 2011.
  7. Love and Passion, Personal Cameos in Late Antiquity from the Content Collection, “Gems of Haven”, Recent Research on Engraved Gemstones in Late Antiquity, c. AD 200–600, Edited by Chris Entwistle and Noël Adams British Museum Research Publication Number 177, 179-186,
  8. London. Plantzos, D. 1997. Crystals and Lenses in the Graeco-Roman World, American Journal of Archaeol-ogy, Vol. 101, No. 3. Richter, G. M. A. 1920.
  9. Catalogue of the engraved gems, Greek, Etruscan and Roman of the Met-ropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Richter, G. M. A. 1968. The Subjects on Roman Engraved Gems Their Derivation, Style and Mean-ing, Revue Archéologique, Nouvelle Série, Fasc. 2, Études de sculpture antique offertes à Jean Charbonneaux, 2. Spier, J. 1992. Ancient Gems and Finger Rings: Catalogue of the Collections, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu-California. Thompson, N. L. 2007.
  10. Roman Art, A Resource for Educator, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Vermeule, C. 1963.
  11. A Collection of Greek and Roman Gems, Bulletin of the Museum of Fine Arts, Vol. 61, No. 323. Zwierlein-Diehl, E. 2011. Gem Portraits of Soldier-Emperors, “Gems of Haven”, Recent Research on Engraved Gemstones in Late Antiquity, c. AD 200–600, Edited by Chris Entwistle and Noël Adams British Museum Research Publication Number 177, 149-163, London.