SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2018 / Cilt: 158 - Sayı: 158

NINE LIVES OF STATUES: RE-USE OF HONORIFIC STATUES IN LATE ANTIQUE ASIA MINOR

Dokuz Canlı Heykeller Geç Antik Dönem Küçük Asya’sında Onurlandırma Heykellerinin Yeniden Kullanımı

Esen ÖĞÜŞ
Pages
39–46
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it suggests that when one adopts the cultural biography approach in favor of an object-based aesthe-tism, one can better understand the kinetic life story of material culture and identify several aspects of the political agenda lying underneath the statue habit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper focuses on the common practice of the re-use of honorific statues in late antiquity (rough-ly fourth-seventh centuries).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It aims to demonstrate that the use and re-use of statues throughout their cultural biography is not fixed, but rather transient.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it suggests that when one adopts the cultural biography approach in favor of an object-based aesthe-tism, one can better understand the kinetic life story of material culture and identify several aspects of the political agenda lying underneath the statue habit.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper focuses on the common practice of the re-use of honorific statues in late antiquity (rough-ly fourth-seventh centuries). It aims to demonstrate that the use and re-use of statues throughout their cultural biography is not fixed, but rather transient. Statues can go in and come out of social networks between human beings and “things.” This paper highlights as one of the reasons of the transient biography of honorific statues the conflict between pagans and Christians. In addition, it suggests that when one adopts the cultural biography approach in favor of an object-based aesthe-tism, one can better understand the kinetic life story of material culture and identify several aspects of the political agenda lying underneath the statue habit.

Özet

Bu makale, Geç Antik Dönem’de (yak. 4.-7. yüzyıllar arası) yaygın olarak uygulanan onurlandırma hey-kellerinin yeniden kullanımı uygulamasına yoğunlaşmaktadır. Makalenin amacı, heykellerin kültürel yaşamöyküleri boyunca kullanım ve yeniden kullanımlarının sabit değil değişken olduğunu, heykellerin insanlar ve nesneler arasındaki sosyal ağlara esnek olarak girip çıkabileceklerini göstermektir. Burada onurlandırma heykellerinin değişken yaşamöykülerinin en önemli nedenlerinden biri olarak pagan-larla Hıristiyanlar arasındaki çatışma vurgulanmaktadır. Ayrıca nesne temelli estetizm yerine kültürel yaşamöyküsü yaklaşımı kullanıldığında, maddi kültürün kinetik hayat öyküsünü ve heykel geleneğinin altında yatan politik gündemin birçok yönünü anlamak mümkün olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞÜŞ, E. (2022). NINE LIVES OF STATUES: RE-USE OF HONORIFIC STATUES IN LATE ANTIQUE ASIA MINOR. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 158 - Sayı: 158, 39–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/448511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alzinger 1972-1975. “Das Regierungsviertel”, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen archäologischen Instituts in Wien, Beiblatt 50: 229-300.
  2. Boschung, D. 1993. Die Bildnisse des Augustus. Das römische Herrscherbild, pt. I, Vol. 2. Gebrüder Mann Verlag, Berlin. Chaniotis, A. 2008. “The Conversion of the Temple of Aphrodite at Aphrodisias in Context”, J. Hahn, S. Emmel ve U. Gotter (yay.) From Temple to Church. Destruction and Renewal of Local Cultic Topography in Late Antiquity: 243-273.
  3. Brill, Leiden and Boston. Dessau, H. (yay.) 1892–1916. Inscriptiones latinae selectae. Berlin. Foss, C. 1979. Ephesus after Antiquity. A Late Antique, Byzantine and Turkish City. Cambridge University Press,
  4. Cambridge, MA. Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA ve Oxford. İnan, J. ve E. Alföldi-Rosenbaum 1979. Römische und frühbyzantinische Porträtplastik aus der Türkei. Neue Funde. Philipp von Zabern, Mainz. Jones, A. H. M., J. R. Martindale ve J. Morris 1980. The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Volume I. A.D. 260-395.
  5. Cambridge University Press,
  6. Cambridge. Jones, C. ve R. R. R. Smith 1994. “Two Inscribed Monuments at Aphrodisias”, Archaologischer Anzeiger: 455-472.
  7. Kalinka, E. (yay.) 1930.
  8. Tituli Asiae Minoris, II. Tituli Lyciae linguis Graeca et Latina conscripti. Fasc. 2, nos 396-717, Regio quae ad Xanthum flumen pertinet praeter Xanthum oppidum, Viyana. Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commodization as a Process”, A. Appadurai (yay.) The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective: 64-91.
  9. Cambridge University Press,
  10. Cambridge. Kristensen, T. M. ve L. Stirling 2016. “The Lives and Afterlives of Greek and Roman Sculpture: From Use to Refuse”, The Afterlife of Greek and Roman Sculpture. Late Antique Responses and Practices: 1-26.
  11. University of Michigan Press,
  12. Ann Arbor, MI. Ladstätter, S. ve A. Pülz 2007. “Ephesus in the Late Roman and Early Byzantine period: Changes in its Urban Character from the Third to the Seventh Century AD”, A. G. Poulter (yay.) The Transition to Late Antiquity on the Danube and Beyond: 391-433.
  13. British Academy, London. Langmann, G. 1985. “Eine Kaisertufe (?) in Ephesos”, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen archäolo-gischen Instituts in Wien 56: 65-69.
  14. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford Uni-versity Press,
  15. Oxford. Miltner, F. 1958. Ephesos. Stadt der Artemis und des Johannes. Verlag