SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 159

AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY IN URARTIAN KINGDOM AND THE ECONOMIC ORGANISATION OF THE KINGDOM

Urartu Krallığı'nda Tarımve Hayvancılık ile KrallığınEkonomi Politikası*

Ali Çifçi
Pages
19–30
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This studyalso proposed three different developmental stages for the socio-economic and political development of the Urartian kingdom: an ‘early expansionist’, a ‘crisis period’ and a ‘restructuring andreform’ period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the socio-economic structure of the Urartian kingdom is examined by consideringthe archaeological and written evidence of the state’s activities related to agriculture and animalhusbandry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Military campaignof Urartian kings also generated revenues in terms of booty and tribute for the state economy.Metallurgical and trade activities also made substantial contribution to the state economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This studyalso proposed three different developmental stages for the socio-economic and political development of the Urartian kingdom: an ‘early expansionist’, a ‘crisis period’ and a ‘restructuring andreform’ period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the socio-economic structure of the Urartian kingdom is examined by consideringthe archaeological and written evidence of the state’s activities related to agriculture and animalhusbandry. The state economy is based on agriculture and animal husbandry. Military campaignof Urartian kings also generated revenues in terms of booty and tribute for the state economy.Metallurgical and trade activities also made substantial contribution to the state economy. This studyalso proposed three different developmental stages for the socio-economic and political development of the Urartian kingdom: an ‘early expansionist’, a ‘crisis period’ and a ‘restructuring andreform’ period.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Urartu Krallığı'nın sosyo-ekonomik yapısı, devletin tarım ve hayvancılıkla ilgili etkinliklerine dair arkeolojik ve yazılı veriler göz önünde bulundurularak incelenmektedir. Urartu krallık ekonomisinin temelini tarım ve hayvancılık oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca askerî seferler sonucu elde edilen ganimetler, vergiler, ticaret ve madencilik de krallık ekonomisine önemli katkılar yapmıştır. Bu çalışmada ayrıca Urartu Krallığı'nın sosyo-ekonomik ve politik gelişiminin "erken yayılmacı", "kriz dönemi" ve "yeniden yapılanma ve reform" olmak üzere üç farklı gelişim evresi gösterdiği ifade edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çifçi, A. (2022). AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY IN URARTIAN KINGDOM AND THE ECONOMIC ORGANISATION OF THE KINGDOM. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 159, 19–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/448472

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ARAB I-II = Luckenbill, D. D. 1989. Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia I-II. Histories & Mysteries of Man, London. Atalay, İ. ve K. Mortan 1997. Türkiye Bölgesel Coğrafyası. İnkılap Yayınevi,
  2. İstanbul.
  3. Ayvazian, A. 2006. Urartian Glyptic: New Perspectives. Unpublished PhD, University of California. Barnett, R. D. 1950. “The Excavations of the British Museum at Toprak Kale near Van”, Iraq 12/1: 1-43.
  4. Barnett, R.D. 1959. “Further Russian Excavations in Armenia (1949-1953)”, Iraq 21: 1-19.
  5. Barnett, R. D. ve W. Watson 1952. “Russian Excavations in Armenia”, Iraq 14/2: 132-147.
  6. Bedigian, D. ve J. Harlan 1986. “Evidence for cultivation of sesame in the ancient world”, Economic Botany 40/2: 137-154.
  7. Belli, O. 1978. “Urartu Sanatının Sosyo-Ekonomik Açıdan Eleştirisi Üzerine Bir Deneme”, Anadolu Araştırmaları VI: 45-95.
  8. Belli, O. 1982. “Urartular”, Anadolu Uygarlıkları Ansiklopedisi I: 139-208.
  9. Görsel Yayınlar, İstanbul.
  10. Belli, O. 1991. “Ore Deposits and Mining in Eastern Anatolia in the Urartian Period: Silver, Copper and Iron”, R. Merhav (yay.) Urartu: A Metalworking Center in the First Millennium BCE: 16-41.
  11. Israel Museum, Jerusalem. Belli, O. ve M. Salvini 2006. “Pithoi with cuneiform and hieroglyphic inscriptions from Upper Anzaf Fortress”, Studi Micenei Ed Egeo-Anatolici XLVIII: 55-72.
  12. Boessneck, J. ve M. Kokabi 1988. “Tierknochenfunde”, W. Kleiss (yay.) Bastam II: Ausgrabungen in den Urartäischen Anlagen 1977-78: 175-262.
  13. Gebr. Mann. Verlag, Berlin. Cocharro, L. P., A. Rigamonti, L. Castelletti ve A. Maspero 2001. “Preliminary Report on the Plant Remains from Ayanis”, A. Çilingiroğlu ve M. Salvini (yay.) Ayanis I: Ten Years’ Excavations at Rusahinili Eiduru-kai 1989-1998: 391-396. Documenta Asiana 6, CNR; Rome. Costantini, L. ve L. Biasini 1984. “I resti vegetali dei saggi a Qal’eh Ismail Aqa e a Tappeh Gijlar”, P. E. Pecorella ve M. Salvini (yay.) Tra lo Zagros e l’Urmia: Richerche storiche ed archeologiche nell’Azerbaigiano Iranico: 397-402.
  14. Edizioni dellAteneo, Rome. CTU = Salvini, M. 2008. Corpus dei testi Urartei. Le iscrizioni su pietra e roccia. CNR, Roma. Çifçi, A. 2012. “Textiles in the Urartian Kingdom”, Aramazd: Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies VII/2: 36-48.
  15. Çifçi, A. 2015. “Animal Husbandry in Urartian Kingdom”, M. Işıklı ve B. Can (yay.) International Symposium on East Anatolia - South Caucasus Cultures Proceedings I, Vol. II (Uluslararası Doğu Anadolu - Güney Kafkasya Kültürleri Sempozyumu) (Atatürk Universitesi & ESRUC Konsorsiyu