The Çatalhöyük portrait suggests that Asiatic tribes, including those of Mongolian origin, were among these peoples of differing origins.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article discusses some detections, evaluations and comments made on the basis of the lack of similarity between a human face depiction found at Çatalhöyük, located near Konya, and two three-dimensional human head depictions uncovered in the Neolithic levels of Bademağacı Höyük, located near the southern border of the Lakes Region (Ancient Pisidia), and shows that it is very likely that significantly different ethnic groups settled in Anatolia during the Neolithic Period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article discusses some detections, evaluations and comments made on the basis of the lack of similarity between a human face depiction found at Çatalhöyük, located near Konya, and two three-dimensional human head depictions uncovered in the Neolithic levels of Bademağacı Höyük, located near the southern border of the Lakes Region (Ancient Pisidia), and shows that it is very likely that significantly different ethnic groups settled in Anatolia during the Neolithic Period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Çatalhöyük portrait suggests that Asiatic tribes, including those of Mongolian origin, were among these peoples of differing origins.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This article discusses some detections, evaluations and comments made on the basis of the lack of similarity between a human face depiction found at Çatalhöyük, located near Konya, and two three-dimensional human head depictions uncovered in the Neolithic levels of Bademağacı Höyük, located near the southern border of the Lakes Region (Ancient Pisidia), and shows that it is very likely that significantly different ethnic groups settled in Anatolia during the Neolithic Period. The Çatalhöyük portrait suggests that Asiatic tribes, including those of Mongolian origin, were among these peoples of differing origins.
Özet
Konya yakınlarında bulunan Çatalhöyük'te ortaya çıkarılan bir insan yüzü tasviri ile Göller Bölgesi’nin(Antik Pisidia) güney sınırı yakınlarındaki Bademağacı Höyüğü’nün Neolitik katmanlarında ele geçen2 tam plastik insan başı tasviri arasındaki benzemezliğe dayalı olarak yapılan bazı tespit, değerlendirmeve yorumları konu alan bu yazıda, Anadolu'nun Neolitik Çağ'da çok farklı etnik kökenli topluluklartarafından iskân edildiğinin güçlü bir olasılık olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Çatalhöyük portresi, budeğişik kökenli halklar arasında Asianik kavimlerin, özellikle de Moğol asıllıların bulunması olasılığınıakla getirmektedir.
🔖
Cite This Article
DURU, R. (2022). SOME COMMENTS AND FINDINGS CONCERNING THE ‘HUMAN FACE DEPICTIONS’ FROM THE NEOLITHIC LEVELS OF ÇATALHÖYÜK AND BADEMAĞACI HÖYÜK. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 162 - Sayı: 162, 11–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/448422
Bilgi, Ö. 2012. Anadolu’da İnsan Görüntüleri (Klasik Çağ Öncesi). Aygaz A.Ş., İstanbul.
Duru, R. 2003. “Burdur Bölgesi toplumlarının Neolitik’e geçiş sürecine, Anadolu’nun diğer kültürlerinin etkileri üzerine bir deneme”, A. Boratav, O. Tanındı ve M. Özbaşaran (yay.) Archaeological Essays In Honor of Homo Amatus: Güven Arsebük İçin Armağan Yazılar: 71-85.
Ege Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Duru, R. ve G. Umurtak 2019. Bademağacı Höyüğü Kazıları – I - Excavations at Bademağacı Höyük. İstanbul.
Mellaart, J. 1962. “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük”, Anatolian Studies XII: 41-65.
Mellaart, J. 1967. Çatal Hüyük. A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. Thames & Hudson, London. Mellaart, J. 2000. Çatalhöyük. Anadolu'da Bir Neolitik Kent. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.