SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2021 / Cilt: 166 - Sayı: 166

THE BEAR CULT IN THE NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGES IN SOUTHERN SIBERIA AND ITS CONTEMPORARY ETHNOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS

Güney Sibirya’da Neolitik veTunç Çağlarında Ayı Kültüve Kültün GünümüzdekiEtnografik Yansımaları

Ayça AVCI
Pages
59–80
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also in this study, data of theprehistoric connections of the South Siberian Turkic people were tried to be revealed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The bear cult which is common among the indigenous people of the Siberia region, has been studiedby many ethnographers for more than a hundred years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the data obtained during thistime has been compared with archaeological data of the region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also in this study, data of theprehistoric connections of the South Siberian Turkic people were tried to be revealed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The bear cult which is common among the indigenous people of the Siberia region, has been studiedby many ethnographers for more than a hundred years. In this study, the data obtained during thistime has been compared with archaeological data of the region. Ethnographic and archaeologicaldata of Cis-Baikal and Saian-Altai regions are the focus of this article. Also in this study, data of theprehistoric connections of the South Siberian Turkic people were tried to be revealed.

Özet

Sibirya bölgesi yerli halkları arasında yaygın bir kült olan ayı kültü pek çok etnograf tarafından yüz yıldan fazla bir süredir araştırılmaktadır. Bunca zaman boyunca elde edilen veriler bu çalışmada arkeolojik verilerle mukayese edilmiştir. Cis-Baykal ve Sayan-Altay bölgelerine ait etnografik ve arkeolojik veriler bu makalenin odak noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Güney Sibirya Türk halklarının prehistorik bağlantılarına ait veriler ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, A. (2022). THE BEAR CULT IN THE NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGES IN SOUTHERN SIBERIA AND ITS CONTEMPORARY ETHNOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 166 - Sayı: 166, 59–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/448378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Arsebük, G., 1996. “Trakya’da Eski Bir Yerleşim Yeri: Yarımburgaz Mağarası Alt Paleolitik Çağ Bulguları”, Anadolu Araştırmaları XIV: 33-50
  2. Bazaliyskiy, V.İ., Peskov, S.A., Şetnikov A.A., Tyutrin A.A. 2016. “Ranneneolitiçeskiy Mogilnik Motı-Novaya Şamanka v Doline r. İrkut”, Seriya Geoarheologiya Etnologiya Antropologiya 18: 40-72
  3. Berdnikov, N.E. 2012. “Situatskii “Pererıvov” v Arheologii Vozmojnosti İnterpretatsiy (Baykalskaya Sibir)”, Seriya Geoarheologiya Etnologiya Arheologiya 1: 178-202
  4. Burtseva, T., Uvarova, T., Savvina, M., Shadrin, V., Avrusin, S., Chasnyk, V. 2013. “Health Status of Native People Living in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)”, International Journal of Circompolar Health: 1-4
  5. Campbell, L., Mixco, M.J. 2007. “A Glossary of Historical Linguistics” Edinburgh University Press,
  6. Edinburg. Chichilo, B. 1985. “The Cult of the Bear and Soviet Ideology in Siberia”, Religion in Communist Lands 13(2): 166-181
  7. Dyrenkova, N.P. 1930. “Bear Worship Among Turkish Tribes of Siberia”, Proceedings The 23th International Congress of Americanists: 410-430
  8. Goryunova, O.İ. 1981. Bronzıy Vek Priangar’ya Mogil’nik Şumiliha. İrkutsk Devlet Üniversitesi,
  9. İrkutsk. Goryunova, O.İ. 2002. Drevniye Mogil’niki Pribaykalya (Neolit-Bronzovıy Vek). İrkutsk Devlet Üniversitesi,
  10. İrkutsk. Goryunova, O.İ., Novikov, A.G. 2018. “Jade Artifacts from Bronze Age Cemeteries in the CisOlkhon Area, the Western Coast of Lake Baikal”, Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 46(4): 33-41
  11. Goryunova, O.I., Novikov. A.G., Weber, A.W. 2020. “Middle Holocene hunter–gatherer mortuary practices in the Little Sea microregion on Lake Baikal, part II: Late Neolithic”, Archaeological Research in Asia 24: 1-22
  12. Gulyayev, V.İ. 2017. “Obraz Medved’ya v Skifo-Sibirskom Zverinom Stile”, Arheoligiya Evraziyskih Stepney 24: 119-140
  13. Güneri, S.A. 2018.
  14. Türk Altay Kuramı, Kaynak Yayınları, 1. baskı, İstanbul Hallowell, A.I. 1926. “Bear Ceremonialsm in the Northern Hemisphere”, American Anthropologist 28(1): 1-163
  15. Jambaltarova, E.D., Klement’ev A. M. 2011. “Ranneneolitiçeskiy Ob’kt s Çerepom Medvedya v Strukture Fofonovskogo Mogil’nika”, Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universitate Ser. İstoriya, Filologiya 10(5): 162-167
  16. Jambaltarova, E.D. 2013. “Kul’t Medvedya u Drevnego Naseleniya Yugo-Vostoçno Pribaykal’ya: İnterpretatsiya Ranneneolitiçeskogo Ob’ekta s Çerepom Medvedya Fofanovskogo Mogil’nika”, Rossiya i ATR 3(81): 142-151
  17. Kirillova, İ.V., Yudin, V.G. 2018. “Çelovek i Medved v İstorii S