SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2021 / Cilt: 168 - Sayı: 168

Analytical Investigation of Two Kouroi in Ephesus Museum

EFES MÜZESI'NDE İKİ KOUROSUN ANALİTİK İNCELEMESI

Ali Kazım ÖZ
Erhan AYDOĞDU
Mehmet Güven KOÇAK
Pages
81–104
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is thought that the findings will also contribute to the history of mathematics research and sculpture education and practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, two kouroi, found in the Claros sanctuary and exhibited in the Ephesus Museum, were modeled three-dimensionally by using photogrammetric techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By using the method developed for the three-dimensional analytical analysis of the sculptures, the proportion system of the kouroi was analyzed and the connection between the artistic lines and proportion system was revealed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that the findings will also contribute to the history of mathematics research and sculpture education and practices.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, two kouroi, found in the Claros sanctuary and exhibited in the Ephesus Museum, were modeled three-dimensionally by using photogrammetric techniques. By using the method developed for the three-dimensional analytical analysis of the sculptures, the proportion system of the kouroi was analyzed and the connection between the artistic lines and proportion system was revealed. Thus, geometric plans were obtained that explain the proportion system of these sculptures. This study proposes an analytical method to understand the proportion system used in Greek sculpture and to solve the canon problem. Examples of how the proposed method can be used in museology and conservation studies are also given in this study. It is thought that the findings will also contribute to the history of mathematics research and sculpture education and practices.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Klaros Kutsal Alanı’nda bulunan ve Efes Müzesi’nde sergilenen iki kouros, fotogrametri yöntemiyle üç boyutlu olarak modellenmiştir. Heykellerin üç boyutlu analitik analizi için geliştirilen yöntem kullanılarak, heykellerin orantı sistemi çözümlenmiş ve artistik çizgilerle orantı sistemi arasındaki bağlantı ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Böylece kourosların orantı sistemini açıklayan geometrik planlar elde edilmiştir. Bu çalışma Hellen heykel sanatında kullanılan orantı sisteminin anlaşılması ve kanon probleminin çözümü için analitik bir yöntem önermektedir. Önerilen yöntemin müzecilik ve konservasyon çalışmalarında nasıl kullanılabileceğinin örnekleri de bu çalışmada verilmiştir. Elde edilen bulguların matematik tarihi araştırmalarına ve heykeltıraşlık eğitimi ve pratiğine de katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, A. K., AYDOĞDU, E., KOÇAK, M. G. (2022). Analytical Investigation of Two Kouroi in Ephesus Museum. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 168 - Sayı: 168, 81–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/448358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akar Tanrıver, D. S. 2009.
  2. The Cult of Apollon Klarios, Oracle Practices and Votive Offerings. Ph. D. diss. Ege University, İzmir.
  3. Akurgal, E. 1964. “Kyzikos’ta Bulunan İki Arkaik Eser”, İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzesi Yıllığı 11-12: 225-231.
  4. Alberti, L. B. 1804. Della Pittura E Della Statua Di Leonbattista Alberti. Milano. Anthes, R. 1963. “Affinity and Difference between Egyptian and Greek Sculpture and Thought in the Seventh and Sixth Centuries B.C.”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107: 60-81.
  5. Barnes, J. (Ed.). 1991. Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton University Press,
  6. New Jersey. Blackman, A. M. 1915.
  7. The Rock Tombs of Meir, Part II, The Tomb-Chapel of Senbi’s Son UkhHotp (B, No. 2), with Two Appendices on Hieroglyphs and Other Details in B, Nos. 1, 2, 4., (Archaeological Survey of Egypt, [Ed. F. LL. Griffith], Twenty-Third Memory). Sold at the Offices of the Egypt Exploration Fund, London. Borbein A. H. “Polykleitos”, (Ed. Olga Palagia ve J. J. Pollitt), Personal Styles in Greek Sculpture: 66-90.
  8. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Boardman, J. 1978. Greek Sculpture the Archaic Period. Oxford University Press,
  10. New York and Toronto. Boyer, Carl B. 1968. A History of Mathematics. John Wiley & Sons, USA, 1968.
  11. Burnet, J. 1930. Early Greek Philosophy. Adam and Charles Black, 4. Edition,
  12. London. Carter, J. B. and Steinberg, L. J. 2010. “Kouroi and Statistics”, American Journal of Archaeology 114/1: 103-128.
  13. Carpenter, R. 1960. Greek Sculpture: A Critical Review. University of Chicago Press,
  14. Chikago. Caskey, L. D. 1924. “The Proportions of the Apollo of Tenea”, American Journal of Archaeology 28/4: 358-367.
  15. Chamonard, J. and Legrand, P. É. 1894. “Inscriptions de Notion”, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 18: 216-221.
  16. Cook, R. M. 1967. “Origins of Greek Sculpture”, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 87: 24-32.
  17. Cook J. M. and Blackman, D. J. 1971. “Archaeology in Western Asia Minor 1965-1970”, Archaeological Reports 17: 33-62.
  18. Davis, W. M. 1981. “Egypt, Samos, and the Archaic Style in Greek Sculpture”, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology: 67: 61-81. De La Genière, J. 1988. “1988 Yılı Eylül Ayında Claros’da Yapılan Çalışmanın Raporu”, Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 28: 293-306. De La Genière, J. 1989. “Le sanctuaire d’Apollon à Claros”, Anatolia Antiqua 1: 31-35. De La Genière, J. “Le sanctuaire d’Apollon à Claros, nouvelles découvertes”, Revue des Études Grecques 103: 95-110. De La Genière, J. 1991. “Claros Kazıları 1990”, 13