Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2003 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2

A parallel implementation of Chebyshev preconditioned conjugate gradient method

Pages
13–21
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since conjugate gradient method and preconditioner contain mainly matrix-vector and matrix-matrix multiplications, convincing results are obtained in terms of both speed and scalability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A parallel implementation for linear set of equations of the form Ax = b is presented in this paper.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The conjugate gradient method is accelerated with an approximate inverse matrix preconditioner obtained from a linear combination of matrix-valued Chebyshev polynomials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since conjugate gradient method and preconditioner contain mainly matrix-vector and matrix-matrix multiplications, convincing results are obtained in terms of both speed and scalability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A parallel implementation for linear set of equations of the form Ax = b is presented in this paper. In this implementation, instead of the traditional direct solution of Ax = b, conjugate gradient method is used. The conjugate gradient method is accelerated with an approximate inverse matrix preconditioner obtained from a linear combination of matrix-valued Chebyshev polynomials. This implementation is tested on a Sun SMP machine. Since conjugate gradient method and preconditioner contain mainly matrix-vector and matrix-matrix multiplications, convincing results are obtained in terms of both speed and scalability.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞ, H., AKÇADOĞAN, Ç. (2022). A parallel implementation of Chebyshev preconditioned conjugate gradient method. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 13–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/448183

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. H. Dağ and A. Semlyen, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18,4 (2003)
  2. M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 49,409 (1952)
  3. Y. Saad and M. Schultz, SI AM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7, 856 (1986)
  4. R. Freund, G. Golub, and N. Nachtigal, Acta Numerica 1, 57 (1991)
  5. J. R. Shewchuk, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (1994)
  6. F. D. Galiana, H. Javidi, and S. McFee, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2, 629 (1994)
  7. H. Mori, H. Tanaka, and J. Kanno, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11, 357 (1996)
  8. H. Dağ and F. L. Alvarado, Proceedings of theNorth American Power Symposium, (Manhattan, KS, September 1994)
  9. A. B. Alves, E. N. Asada, and A. Monticelli, Presented at the IEEE/PES Summer Meeting (Berlin, Germany, 1997)
  10. O. Axelsson, Iterative Solution Methods (Cambridge University Press, 1994)
  11. D. Kershaw, Journal of Computational Physics, 26, 43 (1978)
  12. T. Manteuffel, Mathematics of Computation, 34, 473 (1980).