Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2003 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Use of class C fly ash for stabilization of soft subgrade

Pages
98–104
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some field tests were also performed after the construction, which showed that the fly ash stabilization improved the engineering properties significantly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper represents the results of a study aimed at using self-cementing Class C fly ash for the stabilization of soft subgrade of a city street in Cross Plains, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both strength and modulus-based approaches were applied to estimate the optimum mix design and to determine the thickness of the stabilized layer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some field tests were also performed after the construction, which showed that the fly ash stabilization improved the engineering properties significantly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper represents the results of a study aimed at using self-cementing Class C fly ash for the stabilization of soft subgrade of a city street in Cross Plains, Wisconsin, U.S.A. Both strength and modulus-based approaches were applied to estimate the optimum mix design and to determine the thickness of the stabilized layer. Stabilized soil samples were prepared mixing fly ash at three different contents at varying water contents. The samples were subjected to unconfined compression test after seven days of curing to develop water content-strength relationship. To evaluate the impact of compaction delay that commonly occurs in field construction, one set of the samples was compacted just after mixing with water, while the other set after two hours. CBR and resilient modulus tests were conducted and used to determine the thickness of the stabilized layer in pavement design. Some field tests were also performed after the construction, which showed that the fly ash stabilization improved the engineering properties significantly.

🔖

Cite This Article

BIN-SHAFIQUE, S., EDİL, T. B., BENSON, C. H., ŞENOL, A. (2022). Use of class C fly ash for stabilization of soft subgrade. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 98–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/448160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. R. J. Collins and S. K. Ciesielski, Highway Construction use of wastes and By-products (Utilization of Waste Materials in Civil Engineering Construction, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 140-152, USA. 1992)
  2. G. Ferguson, Use of self-cementing fly ash as a soil stabilizing agent (Geotechnical special publication, No. 36, ASCE New York, NY, USA (1993)
  3. J. P. Turner, Evaluation of Western Coal Fly Ashes for Stabilization of Low-Volume Roads (Testing Soil Mixed with Waste or Recycled Materials, ASTM STP 1275, American Society of Testing and Materials 1997)
  4. T. B. Edil, C. H. Benson, M. S. Bin-Shafique, M. S Tanyu, W. Kim, and A. Şenol, Journalof Transportation Research Record 1786, 36,Washington DC, USA (2002)
  5. S. C. Chu and H. S. Kao, Fly Ash for Soil Improvement-Geotechnical Special Publication 36, 89 (1993)
  6. C. F. Cockrell and J. W. Leonard, Characterization and Utilization Studies of Limestone Modified Fly Ash. Coal Research Bureau, 60 (1970)
  7. TRB, Lime Stabilization: Reactions, Properties, Design, and Construction, State of the Art Report 5. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA (1987)
  8. ASTM Designation: D698-91 (Reapproved 1998) Standard Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600kNm/ m3))
  9. ASTM Designation: D1883-87, Standard tests Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils
  10. FHWA, Fly Ash Facts for the Highway Engineers., FHNA - S A - 44 - 081, December,70, (1995)
  11. AASHTO Designation: T294-94, Resilient Modulus of Unbound Granular Base/Sub base Materials and Sub grade Soils-SHRP Protocol 146
  12. Humboldt Mfg. Co., (Soil Stiffness Gauge (GeoGauge) User Guide, Version 3.3, November 1999).