SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2004 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Optimization of trusses using the simulated annealing method

Tolga HATAY
Y. Cengiz TOKLU
Pages
66–71
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study the fundamentals of this method are discussed through applications on plane trusses through a special 10-bar truss.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Until very recent times, traditional methods were being used for optimization in structural design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Actually, powered by the advances in computer technology, as to software and hardware, new algorithms have been developed based on heuristic techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study the fundamentals of this method are discussed through applications on plane trusses through a special 10-bar truss.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Until very recent times, traditional methods were being used for optimization in structural design. Actually, powered by the advances in computer technology, as to software and hardware, new algorithms have been developed based on heuristic techniques. In these techniques, a large number of solutions are found for the given problem, and choosing the bests among them, a global optimum is searched. Simulated annealing is one of the promising ways to perform this search. In this study the fundamentals of this method are discussed through applications on plane trusses through a special 10-bar truss.

🔖

Cite This Article

HATAY, T., TOKLU, Y. C. (2022). Optimization of trusses using the simulated annealing method. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 66–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/448158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller, Journal of Chemical Physics 21, 1087 (1953)
  2. M.Z. Cohn, A.S. Dinovitzer, Journal of Struc­tural Engineering 120, 617 (1994)
  3. S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt, and M.P. Vecchi, Science 220, 671 (1983)
  4. R.J. Balling, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 117, 2599 (1991)
  5. G.S. Chen, R.J. Bruno, and M. Salama, AIAA Journal 29, 1327 (1990)
  6. H. Tagawa and M. Oshaki, A Continuous Topol­ogy Transition Model for Shape Optimization of Plane Trusses with Uniform Cross-Sectional Area, Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (Buffalo, New York, 1999)
  7. J.S. Moh and D.Y. Chiang, AIAA Journal 38, 1965 (2000)
  8. O. Hasançebi, F. Erbatur, Layout optimization of trusses using simulated annealing, In Proc: 5th International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Computational Engi­neering Using Metaphors From Nature (Top­ping, B.H.V., ed.) (Elsevier, Leuven, 175-190, 2000)
  9. S. Rajeev and C.S. Krishnamoqrthy, Journal of Structural Engineering 123, 350 (1997). [10]A. Csebfalvi and G. Csebfalvi, A new discrete optimization procedure for geometrically non­linear space trusses, Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (Buffalo, New York, 1999). [11]J. Lu, H. Furuya, and Z. Xu, A Feasibility Study on Combining Neural Network and Gradi­ent Methods Based Optimization Algorithms for Structural Optimization, Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza­tion (Buffalo, New York, 1999). [12]X. Guo and G. Cheng, $varepsilon$-Continuation Approach for Truss Topology Optimization, Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (Buffalo, New York, 1999). [13]G.N. Vanderplaats and E. Salajegheh, AIAA Journal 27, 352 (1989). [14]R.T. Haftka and Z. Gurdal, Elements of Struc­tural Optimization (Kluwer Academic Publish­ers, 1992).