Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2004 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Soft modelling of possible blunders in geodetic networks

Pages
26–33
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presentation concludes with numerical examples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Production of highly precise and reliable geodetic positions requires an assessment of the observed values regarding possible outliers or blunders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The one observation leading to the most significant estimated error in the respective step is eliminated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presentation concludes with numerical examples.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Production of highly precise and reliable geodetic positions requires an assessment of the observed values regarding possible outliers or blunders. This is traditionally done using an iterative procedure. In each step, the observations are mutually considered as blundered. The respective error is modelled, estimated and tested for significance assuming normally distributed observations. The one observation leading to the most significant estimated error in the respective step is eliminated. The procedure stops when there is no significance. The wide-spread use of this strategy benefits from its theoretical background, its algorithmic efficiency and its adequacy in standard data processing. However, its main disadvantage is the neglection of multiple blunders in each step. In this study fuzzy logic is used to simultaneously model, estimate and statistically test all possible errors in the observations to overcome this problem. This strategy extending the traditional way is developed and discussed with respect to the classical case. The presentation concludes with numerical examples.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTTERER, H., AKYILMAZ, O. (2022). Soft modelling of possible blunders in geodetic networks. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 26–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/448155

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. K.R. Koch, Parameter estimation and hypoth­esis testing in linear models (Springer-Verlag, New York, N. Y. 2nd Edition, 1999)
  2. W. Baarda, A Testing Procedure for Use in Geodetic Networks. Netherlands Geodetic Com­mission, Publications in Geodesy, New Series, Vol. 2, No. 5, (Delft, The Netherlands, 1968)
  3. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338 (1965)
  4. W. Sun, Survey Review, 32, 344 (1994)
  5. S. Aliosmanoglu, O. Akyılmaz, Vistas for Geodesy in the New Millenium, IAG Springer Series 2002, 125, 382 (2002
  6. R.J. Beckman, R.D. Cook, Outlier. Technomet-rics, 25, 119 (1983)
  7. H. Bandemer, W. Naether, Fuzzy Data Analysis (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992).