Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2004 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Discrete-continuous design optimization of steel structures using simulated annealing

Pages
72–78
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comparison of results obtained with previously published work reveals the efficiency of the S A approach in both continuous and discrete structural optimization problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper is concerned with the use of the simulated annealing algorithm in optimum design of structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, discrete and continuous size optimization of steel trusses is discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comparison of results obtained with previously published work reveals the efficiency of the S A approach in both continuous and discrete structural optimization problems.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the use of the simulated annealing algorithm in optimum design of structures. Specifically, discrete and continuous size optimization of steel trusses is discussed. The objective function is chosen as the weight of the structure and stress, displacement and stability constraints are considered as per Turkish and AISC specifications. Numerical examples are solved using the computer .program SAOPT developed for the purpose. Comparison of results obtained with previously published work reveals the efficiency of the S A approach in both continuous and discrete structural optimization problems.

🔖

Cite This Article

NALÇACI, M., ERBATUR, F. (2022). Discrete-continuous design optimization of steel structures using simulated annealing. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 72–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/448153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. S: Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi,Science 220, 671 (1983)
  2. V. Cerny, Journal of optimization Theory and Applications 45, 41 (1985)
  3. R. J. Balling, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 117, 1780 (1991)
  4. W. A. Bennage and A. K. Dhingra, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 38, 2753 (1995)
  5. T. Elperin, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 26, 815 (1988)
  6. S.A. May and R.J. Balling, Structural Optimiza­tion 4, 142 (1992)
  7. R.K. Kincaid, Structural Optimization 4, 55 (1992)
  8. G.S. Chen, R.J. Bruno, and M. Salama, AIAA Journal 29, 1327 (1991)
  9. C.P. Pantelides and S.R. Tzan, Structural Opti­mization 13, 36 (1997). [10]P.Y Shim and S. Manoochehri, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 40, 1053 (1997). [11]O. Hasançebi, and F. Erbatur, Layout Optimiza­tion of Trusses Using Simulated Annealin, The 5th International Conference on Computational Structures Technology 175, (Leuven, Belgium, 2000). [12]M. Nalçacı, M.sc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University (1998). [13]J. S. Arora, Guide to Structural Optimization, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 90 (American Society of Civil En­gineers, ASCE, 1997). [14]S. Rajeev and C. S. Krishnamoorty, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 118, 1233 (1992). [15]D. M. Zhu, Engineering Optimization 9, 303 (1986). [16]V. B. Venkayya, Computers and Structures 1, 265 (1971). [17]X. Renwei and L. Peng, Computer methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 65, 101 (1987). [18]L.A. Schmit and H. Miura, AIAA Journal 14, 661 (1976). [19]L. A. Schmit and B. Farshi, AIAA Journal 12, 692 (1973). [20]W. Xicheng and M. Guixu, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 96, 25 (1992).