Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2004 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of railway infrastructures with and without ballast referring to the Istanbul metro system

Pages
85–90
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, these two different types of railway infrastructures are analysed and compared from technical economical points of view.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Istanbul is the biggest city of Turkey and moreover either of the Europe and the Middle East.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With its growing population of more than 10 millions, the city has a very important location connecting the two continents Europe and Asia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, these two different types of railway infrastructures are analysed and compared from technical economical points of view.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Istanbul is the biggest city of Turkey and moreover either of the Europe and the Middle East. With its growing population of more than 10 millions, the city has a very important location connecting the two continents Europe and Asia. Highway transportation is the dominant transportation in the city having the share of %94. The railway usage for the inner city facilities is far less when compared to highway. The railway system of the city only carries the %3.6 of the whole demand. As they carry almost the whole city, highways are overloaded and congested especially during peak hours and weekends causing the average speed decrease so much. These undesirable results let the government focus more on railway construction. A new metro line of 8 km has jut started to operate between Taksim and 4. Levent. And studies are being carried out to add new lines to the system from Ayazağa and İkitelli to Yenikapi.This new line is being planned to be constructed partly with ballast and partly without ballast. In this study, these two different types of railway infrastructures are analysed and compared from technical economical points of view.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, Z., ÖZTÜRK, T. (2022). Comparison of railway infrastructures with and without ballast referring to the Istanbul metro system. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 85–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/448141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Greater Municipality of the city of Istanbul, Is­tanbul'un Buyuk Projeleri (2000)
  2. B. Berksoy, Demiryollarında Balastsız Yollar (1995)
  3. V. Profillidis, Railway Engineering (Avebury Technical, Cambridge, 1995)
  4. Documents provided by Istanbul Ulaşım A.Ş. (2001)
  5. TS 3233, Requirements for Design and Con­struction of Prestressed Concrete Structures (TSE, Ankara, Turkey, 1979)
  6. TS 9967, Design, Construction and Erection Methods for Precast Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Elements, Structures and Buildings (TSE, Ankara, Turkey, 1992)
  7. K. Özden, Eren, A.L. Trupia, T. Öztürk, Pre­stressed Concrete, (Istanbul Technical Univer­sity, Civil Engineering Faculty Pres., Istanbul, Turkey, 1988)
  8. AASHTO, Standart Specifications for Highway Bridges (Washington,USA, 1989)
  9. W. Alan, Seismic Design of Buildings and Bridges (Austin, Texas, USA, 1998). [10]B. İnal, Balastsız Üstyapı Term Project (1998).