Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2005 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

Critical problem for an infinite cylinder with forward scattering

Pages
24–28
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Numerical results indicate that the critical radius varies non-monotonically with forward scattering.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The transport of monoenergetic neutrons in a bare homogeneous cylinder is studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The transport equation is solved using $F_N$ method considering the pseudo-problem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Numerical results indicate that the critical radius varies non-monotonically with forward scattering.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The transport of monoenergetic neutrons in a bare homogeneous cylinder is studied. The transport equation is solved using $F_N$ method considering the pseudo-problem. Numerical values for the critical radius are obtained and tabulated for various c values. Numerical results indicate that the critical radius varies non-monotonically with forward scattering. Some selected illustrative results are compared with those already available in the literature. It is also shown that the FN method, though approximate, yields results accurate to at least three or four significant figures for the problem considered.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, C., ALCAN, E., ÖNDER, P., BİROL, E. (2022). Critical problem for an infinite cylinder with forward scattering. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 24–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/448132

References (27)

  1. B. Davison, Canadian J. Phys. 35, 576 (1957)
  2. H. Hembd, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 40, 224 (1970)
  3. A. Kavenoky, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 65, 514 (1978)
  4. R. Sanchez and B. D. Ganapol. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 84, 61 (1983)
  5. G. C. Pomraning, Transp. Theory Statist. Phys. 9, 1 (1980)
  6. C. Tezcan, Theory Stat. Phys. 8, 187 (1979)
  7. C. E. Lee and P. C. W. Pan, Ann. Nucl. Energy 11, 12 (1985)
  8. W. Kofink, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 6, 475 (1959)
  9. N. G. Sjostrand, Chalmers University of Technology, CTH-RF-58, November, Göteborg (1987)
  10. H. Khouaja, D. R. Edwards, and N. Tsoulfanidis, Ann. Nucl. Energy. 24, 515 (1997)
  11. B. G. Carlson and G. I. Bell, Proc. Second Inter. Conf. Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy. Geneva, 16, 535 (1958)
  12. O. E. Lee, The Discrete SN Approximation to Transport Theory, LA-2595, Los Alamos Sci. Laboratory (1962)
  13. C. E. Siewert and J. R.Thomas, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 87, 107 (1984)
  14. C. E. Siewert and P. Benoist, Nucl.Sci. Eng. 69, 156 (1979)
  15. P. Grandjean and C. E. Siewert, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 68, 161 (1979)
  16. R. D. M.Garcia, E. E. Siewert and J. R. Thomas, Jr., Am. Nucl. Soc. 71, 212 (1994)
  17. R. D. M.Garcia and C. E. Siewert, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 78, 315 (1981)
  18. J. R. Thomas, J. D. Southers, and C. E. Siewert, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 84, 79 (1983)
  19. E. İnönü, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 3, 137 (1973)
  20. G. J. Mitsis,Transport Solutions to the Monoenergetic Critical Problem. ANL-6787, Argonne National Laboratory (1963)
  21. K. M. Case and P. F. Zweifel, Linear Transport Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts 1967)
  22. R. D. M.Garcia, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 14, 391 (1985)
  23. D. C. Sahni and N. G. Sjostrand, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 27, 137 (1998)
  24. D. C. Sahni and N. G. Sjostrand, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 20, 339 (1991)
  25. B. D. Ganapol, and D. E. Kornreich, Ann. Nucl. Energy 23, 301 (1996)
  26. P. W. Shao and C. E. Siewert, J. App. Math. and Phys. (ZAMP) 26, 637 (1975)
  27. D. C. Sahni and N. G. Sjostrand, Transport. Prog. Nucl. Energy 23, 241 (1990).