Journals / ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University / 2005 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

Incomplete inverse preconditioners

Pages
48–64
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results indicate that the use of these partitioned incomplete inverses as preconditioners results in excellent highly parallel preconditioners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Incomplete LU factorization is a valuable preconditioning approach for sparse iterative solvers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An "ideal" but inffcient preconditioner for the iterative solution of Ax = b is $A^{-1}$itself.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results indicate that the use of these partitioned incomplete inverses as preconditioners results in excellent highly parallel preconditioners.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Incomplete LU factorization is a valuable preconditioning approach for sparse iterative solvers. An "ideal" but inffcient preconditioner for the iterative solution of Ax = b is $A^{-1}$itself. This paper describes a preconditioner based on sparse approximations to partitioned representations of $A^{-1}$, in addition to the results of implementation of the proposed method in a shared memory parallel environment. The partitioned inverses are normally somewhat sparse. Their sparsity can be enhanced with suitable ordering and partitioning algorithms. Sparse approximations to these partitioned inverse representations can be obtained either by discarding selected nonzero entries of these inverses or by precluding the creation of some inversion fills. Experimental results indicate that the use of these partitioned incomplete inverses as preconditioners results in excellent highly parallel preconditioners.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞ, H., ALVARADO, F. (2022). Incomplete inverse preconditioners. ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 48–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/448128

References (23)

  1. M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 49, 409 (1952)
  2. O. Axelsson, Iterative Solution Methods (Cambridge University Press, 1994)
  3. R. Freund, G. Golub, and N. Nachtigal, Iterative solution of linear systems (Cambridge University Press, 1992)
  4. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore,1989)
  5. J. M. Ortega, Introduction to Parallel and Vector Solution of Linear Systems (Plenum Press, 1988)
  6. D. M. Young, Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems (Academic Press., 1971)
  7. O. Axelsson and T. A. Lindskog, Numerische Mathematik 48 499 (1986)
  8. A. Jennings, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and Applications 20, 61 (1977)
  9. A. van der Sluis and H. van der Vorst, Numerische Mathematik 48, 543 (1986)
  10. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1990)
  11. T. Manteuffel, Mathematics of Computation 34, 473 (1980)
  12. H. Dağ, F. L. Alvarado, and H. Singh, Variations on ILU preconditioners applied to electric network least squaresproblems, Proceedings of the fifth SIAM Conference on Linear Algebra, (Snowbird, Utah, 1994)
  13. I. S. Duff and G. A. Meurant, BIT 29, 635 (1989)
  14. F. L. Alvarado and R. Schreiber, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 446 (1993)
  15. M. K. Enns, W. F. Tinney, and F. L. Alvarado, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 5, 466 (1990)
  16. F. L. Alvarado, D. C. Yu, and R. Betancourt, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 5, 452 (1990)
  17. A. Pothen and F. L. Alvarado, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, (1992)
  18. F. L. Alvarado, A. Pothen, and R.Schreiber, Volume in Mathematics and its Applications 56, 141 (1993)
  19. N. J. Higham and A. Pothen, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 15, 139 (1994)
  20. T. Huckle and M. Grote, Technical Report SCCM-94-03, Scientific Computing and Computational Mathematics Program (Computer Science Department Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, 1994)
  21. L. Y. Kolotilina and Y. Yeremin, SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis and Applications 14, 45 (1993)
  22. H. Dağ and F. L. Alvarado, Propagation of perturbation in entries of power system W-matrices, Proceedings of the North American Power Symposium, (Carbondale, Illinois, 1991)
  23. H. Dağ and F. L. Alvarado, The effect of ordering on the preconditioned conjugate gradient method for power system applications, Proceedings of the North American Power Symposium, (