Journals / Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY AND INQUIRY-BASED LEARNINGACTIVITY: THE SEVEN CONTINENTS

DİSİPLİNLERARASI VE SORGULAMA TEMELLİ BİR ÖĞRENME ETKİNLİĞİ: YEDİ KITA

Pages
69–80
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main area for improvement on this would be to have the students mark their work by looking at a real map of the world instead of a completed version of their worksheet; this would make the assessment more authentic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study introduces a learning activity that was designed based on two student-centered approaches to education: inquiry-based learning and multi-disciplinary education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The activity integrates geography, English, and technology and offers students opportunities for inquiry-based thinking.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main area for improvement on this would be to have the students mark their work by looking at a real map of the world instead of a completed version of their worksheet; this would make the assessment more authentic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study introduces a learning activity that was designed based on two student-centered approaches to education: inquiry-based learning and multi-disciplinary education. Twenty-four second grade students participated in the study. The activity integrates geography, English, and technology and offers students opportunities for inquiry-based thinking. The goal of the activity is for students to find out what the seven continents are, where they are in the world, and create their own little maps. The students collaboratively explore world maps both in hand and on the interactive board. The extension activity is the area of differentiation and acts as differentiation by outcome. Data analysis revealed that all students met the learning goals. The main area for improvement on this would be to have the students mark their work by looking at a real map of the world instead of a completed version of their worksheet; this would make the assessment more authentic.

Özet

Bu çalışma, eğitime yönelik iki öğrenci merkezli yaklaşıma dayalı olarak tasarlanmış bir öğrenmeetkinliğini ortaya koymaktadır: sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme ve disiplinlerarası eğitim. Araştırmaya 24tane ikinci sınıf öğrencisi katılmıştır. Etkinlik; coğrafya, İngilizce ve teknoloji derslerinibütünleştirmekte ve öğrencilere sorgulamaya dayalı düşünme fırsatları sunmaktadır. Etkinliğin amaçlarıöğrencilerin yedi kıtanın ne olduğunu, dünyanın neresinde olduklarını öğrenmeleri ve kendi küçükharitalarını oluşturmalarıdır. Etkinlik kapsamında, öğrenciler dünya haritasını hem fiziksel olarak hemde akıllı tahtada dijital olarak birlikte keşfetmektedirler. Farklılaştırma eğitimi anlayışıyla uyumlu olaraketkinlik sonunda farklı ürünler ortaya koyma seçeneği sunulmaktadır. Veri analizi, tüm öğrencilerinöğrenme hedeflerine ulaştığını ortaya koymuştur. Uygulamada iyileştirilmesi gereken esas alan,öğrencilerin çalışma sayfalarının tamamlanmış bir versiyonu yerine gerçek bir dünya haritasına bakarakçalışmalarını değerlendirmeleri olacaktır; bu revizyonun, değerlendirme sürecini daha gerçekçi bir halegetireceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADAM, G. M. (2022). A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY AND INQUIRY-BASED LEARNINGACTIVITY: THE SEVEN CONTINENTS. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 69–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/447742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students' academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41.
  2. Adam, G. (2020). A critical evaluation of an EAL intervention put in place to prepare weaker EAL students for the motivation and language required at the primary stage recommendations for improvement are provided. International Journal of Advanced Research, 8(3), 684-694. doi: 10.21474/ijar01/10680 Adam, G. (2020). The purpose of education. International Journal of Advanced Research, 8(1), 983-985. doi: 10.21474/ijar01/10391 Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.
  3. Coppersmith, S. A. & Song, K. H. (2017). Integrating primary sources, artifacts, and museum visits into the primary years program inquiry curriculum in an international baccalaureate elementary setting. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 24-49. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1162284
  4. Covell, K., McNeil, J. K., & Howe, R. B. (2009). Reducing teacher burnout by increasing student engagement: A children's rights approach. School Psychology International, 30(3), 282-290.
  5. Dann, R. (2012). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. Routledge. Fogarty, R. J., & Pete, B. M. (2009). How to integrate the curricula. Corwin Press.
  6. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
  7. Keeling, A. (2013). Learning with the international primary curriculum. Retrieved November 22, 2020, from https://theindependent.sg/learning-withthe-international-primary-curriculum/
  8. Nurlaela, L., Samani, M., Asto, I. G. P., & Wibawa, S. C. (2018). The effect of thematic learning model, learning style, and reading ability on the students’ learning outcomes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296, 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/296/1/012039
  9. Smallhorn, M., Young, J., Hunter, N., & da Silva, K. B. (2015). Inquiry-based learning to improve student engagement in a large first year topic. Student Success, 6(2), 65-72. Sotáková, I., Ganajová, M., & Babincáková, M. (2020). Inquiry-based science education as a revision strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 499-513.
  10. Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018). More isn't always better: The curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science. Learning and Instruction, 56,