Journals / Aquaculture Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

A Prelimnary Survey on Perception of Turkish Aquaculture Stakeholders on Climate Change-Aquaculture Interactions

Pages
67–74
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Majority of stakeholdersparticipating in the survey believed that most of the performance parametersincluding feed conversion ratio (FCR), fish health, survival rate and productioncosts, will potentially be affected negatively by climate change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climate change is expected to have direct and indirect impacts onaquaculture sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant socio-economic role of aquaculture in terms of joband income generation as well as food security and economic development callsthe need for a proactive approach for development of adaptation and mitigationpolicies towards climate change and aquaculture interactions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Majority of stakeholdersparticipating in the survey believed that most of the performance parametersincluding feed conversion ratio (FCR), fish health, survival rate and productioncosts, will potentially be affected negatively by climate change.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Climate change is expected to have direct and indirect impacts onaquaculture sector. Significant socio-economic role of aquaculture in terms of joband income generation as well as food security and economic development callsthe need for a proactive approach for development of adaptation and mitigationpolicies towards climate change and aquaculture interactions. Awareness buildingand understanding the perceptions of aquaculture stakeholders regarding theimpact of climate change on aquaculture are important pillars of developingadaptation and/or mitigation policies. This study is a preliminary assessment ofTurkish aquaculture stakeholders’ perception regarding climate change-aquaculture interactions, which was carried out within the activities of EU fundedCERES project (Climate Change and European Aquatic Resources). A semi-structured questionnaire developed by CERES project for this purpose was used tocollect data through face to face interviews. For statistical analysis of the collecteddata, both descriptive and inferential methods were used. Majority of stakeholdersparticipating in the survey believed that most of the performance parametersincluding feed conversion ratio (FCR), fish health, survival rate and productioncosts, will potentially be affected negatively by climate change.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAD, F., AYTEMİZ, T., SEN, I. (2022). A Prelimnary Survey on Perception of Turkish Aquaculture Stakeholders on Climate Change-Aquaculture Interactions. Aquaculture Studies, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 67–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/447617

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ahsan, D., & Brandt, U.S. (2015). Climate change and coastal aquaculture farmers’ risk perceptions: experiences from Bangladesh and Denmark. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58,9, 1649-1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.942414
  2. Anonymous. (2011). Türkiye’nin İklim Değişikliği Uyum Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Ankara,
  3. Turkey. Aphunu, A., & Nwabeze, G.O. (2012). Fish Farmers’ Perception of Climate change impact on fish production in Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 16,(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jae.v16i2.1 BSGM, (2017). Su Ürünleri İstatistikleri. https://www.tarim.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeril er/BSGM.pdf Cochrane, K., De Young, C., Soto, D. & Bahri, T. (2009). Climate change implications for fisheries and aquaculture, Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Rome,Italy. Callaway, R., Shinn, A.P., Grenfell, E.S., Bron, E.J., Burnell, G., Cook, E.J., Crumlish, M., Culloty, S., Davidson, K., Ellis, R.P., Flynn, K.J., Fox, C., Green, D.M., Hays, G.C., Hughes, A.D., Johnston, E., Lowe, C.D., Lupatsch, I., Malham, S., Mendzil, A.F., Nickell, T., Pickerell, T., Rowley, A.F., Stanley, M.S., Tocher, D.R., Turnbull, J.F., Webb, G., Wootton, E. & Shields, R.J. (2012). Review of climate change impacts on marine aquaculture in the UK and Ireland. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 22: 389– 421. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2247
  4. De Silva, S.S., & Soto, D. (2009). Climate change and aquaculture: potential impacts, adaptation and mitigation. In: Cochrane K, Young C, De Soto D, Bahri T (eds) Climate Change Implications for Fisheries and Aquaculture Overview of Current Scientific Knowledge. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical paper: No. 530, pp. 151–212.
  5. FAO, Rome. FAO, (2016). Brief on fisheries, aquaculture and climate change in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC AR5). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Retrived from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5871e.pdf
  6. Fleming, A., Hobday, A.J., Farmery, A., van Putten, E.I., Pecl, G.T., Green, B.S., & Lim Camacho, L. (2014). Climate change risks and adaptation options across Australian seafood supply chains – A preliminary assessment. Climate Risk Management, 1,39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2013.12.003
  7. Giorgi, F., & Lionello, P. (2008). Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global and Planetary Change, 63,90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.20