Journals / Aquaculture Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Numerical Analysis of the Dynamic Response of a Single-Point Mooring Fish Cage in Waves and Currents

Pages
25–35
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The simulatedresults indicated that adding a buoy as part of a cage system was helpful for reducingthe force and deformation of the cage collar, and the current contributed greatly tothe total load on the cage system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we developed a numerical model of a single-point mooring (SPM) cagesystem based on the finite element method, and employed it to simulate the dynamicresponse of the cage system under conditions with waves and currents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We focusedmainly on the mooring line tension and deformation for the cage collar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The simulatedresults indicated that adding a buoy as part of a cage system was helpful for reducingthe force and deformation of the cage collar, and the current contributed greatly tothe total load on the cage system.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we developed a numerical model of a single-point mooring (SPM) cagesystem based on the finite element method, and employed it to simulate the dynamicresponse of the cage system under conditions with waves and currents. We focusedmainly on the mooring line tension and deformation for the cage collar. The simulatedresults indicated that adding a buoy as part of a cage system was helpful for reducingthe force and deformation of the cage collar, and the current contributed greatly tothe total load on the cage system. In addition, the location of the greatest deformationof the cage collar was confirmed by comparing the stress results for different points inthe collar structure when exposed to strong waves and current. Therefore, to avoidplastic failure, we tested a connected component with a lower pipe diameter to wallthickness ratio to effectively reduce the deformation of the floating pipes, therebyenhancing the security of the SPM cage system under severe sea conditions.Furthermore, we analyzed and discussed the effects of the material characteristics onthe dynamic properties of the SPM cage system.

🔖

Cite This Article

HU, Y., HUANG, X., LIU, H., TAO, Q., WANG, S., YUAN, T. (2022). Numerical Analysis of the Dynamic Response of a Single-Point Mooring Fish Cage in Waves and Currents. Aquaculture Studies, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 25–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/447603

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bessonneau, J.S., & Marichal, D. (1998). Study of the dynamics of submerged supple nets (applications to trawls). Ocean Engineering, 25(7): 563–583. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0029-8018 (97) 00035-8.
  2. DeCew, J., Fredriksson, D.W., Lader, P.F., Chambers, M., Howell, W.H., Osienki, M.,Celikkol, B., Frank, K., & Høy, E. (2013). Field measurements of cage deformation using acoustic sensors. Aquacultural Engineering, 57(6): 114– 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.aquaeng. 2013. 09.006 DeCew, J., Tsukrov, I., Risso, A., Swift, M.R., & Celikkol, B. (2010). Modeling of dynamic behavior of a single-point moored submersible fish cage under currents. Aquacultural Engineering, 43(2): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2010.05.002.
  3. Ding, D.L., Liu, W.H., & Ou, C.H. (2007). Use of non-linear regression to evaluate drag force and volume coefficient of structure of square cage. Fisheries Science, 73(6): 1249–1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2007.01462.x.
  4. FAO. (2016). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org.
  5. Fredriksson, D.W., DeCew, J.C., & Tsukrov, I. (2007). Development of structural modeling techniques for evaluating HDPE plastic net pens used in marine aquaculture. Ocean Engineering, 34(16): 2124–2137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.04.007.
  6. Goudey, C.A., Loverich, G., Kite-Powell, H., & Costa-Pierce, B. A. (2001). Mitigating the environmental effects of mariculture through single-point moorings (SPMs) and drifting cages. Ices Journal of Marine Science, 58 (2): 497–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ jmsc.2000.1033 Hao, S.H. (2008). The study of fluid-structure interaction of the flotation ring of a gravity-type fish cage (PhD Thesis). Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China. Haritos, N., & He D.T. (1992) Modelling the response of cable elements in an ocean environment. Finite Elements in Analysis & Design, 11(1): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0168-874X(92)90026-9.
  7. Huang, C.C., Tang, H.J., & Liu, J.Y. (2008). Effects of waves and currents on gravity-type cages in the open sea. Aquacultural Engineering, 38(2): 105–116. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.aquaeng. 2008.01.003. Huang, X.H., Guo, G.X., Tao, Q.Y., Hu, Y., Liu, H.Y, Wang, S.M, & Hao, S. H. (2016). Numerical simulation of deformations and forces of a floating fish cage collar in waves. Aquacultural Engineering, 74: 111–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.07.003.
  8. Huang, X.H., Guo, G.X., Tao, Q.Y., Hu, Y., Liu, H.Y., Wang, S.M., & H