SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Aquaculture Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Performance of Different Biomaterials as Carbon Sources on the Immunological Response and Oxidative Status of African Catfish Clarias gariepinus in Biofloc Systems

Omoniyi Michael POPOOLA
Oyelade Ayomide MIRACLE
Pages
800–800
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were significant differences in serological content in fish between the treatment’s groups (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A trial was performed to investigate how carbon sources can affect the welfare status of African catfish (3.8±0.2g and 8±0.11 cm) juveniles in biofloc systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inocula was prepared in glass tanks (5L) by adding 20g of pond bottom soil in well aerated water (1L) containing 10mg L-1 ammonium sulphate (NH)4SO4 and 400mg L-1 of four different carbon sources (tapioca, wheat offal, brewery and cassava peel) for 24 hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were significant differences in serological content in fish between the treatment’s groups (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A trial was performed to investigate how carbon sources can affect the welfare status of African catfish (3.8±0.2g and 8±0.11 cm) juveniles in biofloc systems. Inocula was prepared in glass tanks (5L) by adding 20g of pond bottom soil in well aerated water (1L) containing 10mg L-1 ammonium sulphate (NH)4SO4 and 400mg L-1 of four different carbon sources (tapioca, wheat offal, brewery and cassava peel) for 24 hours. Each treatment group (carbon sources and control) were replicated and each tank contained 1000 Clarias gariepinus juvenile, fed with commercial feed (Crude protein 42%) at 5% of their body weight 72 days. The water quality showed that all water parameters remained at concentrations suitable for Clarias gariepinus culture in the studied systems. The enzymes activities were noticed to be different across the biofloc and the selected organs. There were significant differences in serological content in fish between the treatment’s groups (P

🔖

Cite This Article

POPOOLA, O. M., MIRACLE, O. A. (2022). Performance of Different Biomaterials as Carbon Sources on the Immunological Response and Oxidative Status of African Catfish Clarias gariepinus in Biofloc Systems. Aquaculture Studies, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 800–800. https://ajindex.com/articles/447559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahmadpoor, P., Eftekhar, E., Nourooz-Zadeh, J., Servat, H., Makhdoomi, K. & Ghafari, A. (2009). Glutathione, glutathione-related enzymes, and total antioxidant capacity in patients on maintenance dialysis. Iranian Journal of Kidney Dialysis, 3, 22 –27. PMID: 19377255. Asaduzzaman, M.; Wahab, M.A.; Verdegem, M.C.J.; Huque, S.; Salam, M.A. & Azim, M.E., (2008). C/N ratio control and substrate addition for periphyton development jointly enhance freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii production in ponds. Aquaculture, 280(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.04.019
  2. Avnimelech, Y. (1999). Carbon and nitrogen ratio as a control element in Aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 176, 227– 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00085-X
  3. Avnimelech, Y. (2007). Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds. Aquaculture, 264(1), 140-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.025
  4. Avnimelech, Y. (2009). Biofloc Technology. A Practical Guide Book. The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, Azim, M. E.; Little, D.C. & Bron, J.E. (2008). Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipulating C: N ratio in feed and the implications for fish culture. Bioresource Technology, 99(9), 3590-3599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.063
  5. Bondad-Reantaso, M.G., Subasinghe, R.P., Arthur, J.R., Ogawa, K., Chinabut, S., Adlard, R., Tan, Z. & Shariff, M. (2005). Disease and health management in Asian aquaculture. Vetenary Parasitology, 132(3), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.07.005
  6. Browdy, C., Hargreaves, J., Hoang, T. & Avnimelech, Y. (2013). Biofloc Technology and Shrimp Disease Workshop. Browdy, C.L. (2006). Effect of natural production in a zeroexchange suspended microbial floc based superintensive culture system for white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 258(1), 396-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.030
  7. Burford, M., Thompson, P., McIntosh, R., Bauman, R., & Pearson, D. (2004). The contribution of flocculated material to shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) nutrition in a high-intensity, zero-exchange system. Aquaculture, 232, 525-537
  8. Burford, M.A., Thompson, P.J., McIntosh, R.P., Bauman, R.H. & Pearson, D.C. (2003). Nutrient and microbial dynamics in high intensity, zero-exchange shrimp ponds in Belize. Aquaculture, 219(1), 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(02)00575-6
  9. Castex, M., Lemaire, P., Wabete, N. & Chim, L