SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Antropoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35

Age Estimation Methods in Forensic Anthropology

ADLİ ANTROPOLOJİDE YAŞ TAHMİNİ METODLARI

Deren ÇEKER
Pages
35–54
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article will discuss the utility and the challenges of traditional and popular methods and techniques used to estimate the age at death where human skeletons are examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Forensic anthropology is a branch of science that biological profiles can be established from human bones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the most important phases in establishing biological profile from human bones is to determine the age of the individuals at the time of death.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article will discuss the utility and the challenges of traditional and popular methods and techniques used to estimate the age at death where human skeletons are examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Forensic anthropology is a branch of science that biological profiles can be established from human bones. One of the most important phases in establishing biological profile from human bones is to determine the age of the individuals at the time of death. Anthropologists use various methods to determine age in sub-adult and adult individuals, and apply various techniques according to the sex of adult individuals. The age estimation methods generally include dental, osteological, histological and composite methods. This article will discuss the utility and the challenges of traditional and popular methods and techniques used to estimate the age at death where human skeletons are examined.

Özet

Adli antropoloji, insan kemiklerinden biyolojik profil oluşturulan bir bilim dalıdır.İnsan kemiklerinden biyolojik profil elde etme safhalarının en önemlilerinden biri,bireyin ölüm zamanındaki yaşını tespit etmektir. Antropologlar yaş belirlemek içinerişkin olmayan ve erişkin bireylerde farklı yöntemler kullanmakta ve erişkinbireylerin cinsiyetine göre değişen çeşitli metotlar uygulamaktadırlar. Bu metotlargenel olarak dental, osteolojik, histolojik ve kompozit metotları içermektedir. Bumakalede, insan iskeletlerinin incelendiği vakalarda ölüm zamanındaki yaştahmininde kullanılan geleneksel ve popüler metotlardan, bu metotlarınuygulanabilirliğinden ve bazı durumlarda karşılaşılan zorluklardan bahsedilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEKER, D. (2022). Age Estimation Methods in Forensic Anthropology. Antropoloji, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35, 35–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/447535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aka, P. S., Yagan, M., Canturk, N. ve Dagalp, R. (2015). Primary Tooth Development in Infancy: A Text and Atlas, August 26, 2015,
  2. CRC Press.
  3. Albert, A. M. ve Maples, W. R. (1995). Stages of epiphyseal union for thoracic and lumbar vertebral centra as a method of age determination for teenage and young adult skeletons, J Forensic Sci, 40(4), 623-33.
  4. AlQahtani, S. J, Hector, M.P. ve Liversi, H.M. (2014). Accuracy of dental age estimation charts: Schour and Massler, Ubelaker and the London Atlas. Am. J. of Physical Anthropology, 154(1), 70–78.
  5. AlQahtani, S. J. (2008). Atlas of tooth development and eruption. Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Queen Mary University of London, MClinDent. Barchilon, V., Hershkovitz, I., Rothschild, B., Wish-Baratz, S., Latimer, B., Jellema, L., Hallel, T. ve Arensburg, B. (1996). Factor affecting the rate and pattern of the first costal cartilage ossification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 17(3), 239-47.
  6. Barres, D. R., Durigon, M. ve Paraire, F. (1989). Age estimation from quantification of features of “chest plate” x-rays. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 34, 28 – 33. Bethard, J. (2005). A Test of the Transition Analysis Method for Estimation of Ageat- Death in Adult Human Skeletal Remains. MA Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. Boldsen, J. L., Milner, G. R., Konigsberg L. W. ve Wood, J. W (2002). “Transition Analysis: A new method for estimating age from skeletons”. Paleodemography: Age Distributions from Skeletal Samples. R. Hoppa ve J. Vaupel (Ed.), pp. 73-106,
  7. Cambridge University Press,
  8. Cambridge Brooks, S. ve Suchey, J. M. (1990). Skeletal Age Determination Based on the Os Pubis: A comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks Methds. Human Evolution, 5(3), 227-238.
  9. Brooks, S. T. (1955). Skeletal age at death: The reliability of cranial and pubic age indicators. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 13, 567 – 589. Brothwell, D.R. (1963).
  10. Dental Anthropology. Pergamon Press,
  11. New York. Buckberry, J. L. ve Chamberlain, A. T. (2002). Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: a revised method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 119, 231 – 239. Buikstra, J. E.ve Ubelaker, D. H. (1994). Standarts for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series, 44. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville. Christensen, M. A., Passalacqua, V. N. ve Bartelink J. E. (2014) Forensic Anthropology: Current Methods and Practice. Academic