SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Antropoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 36

Sex Estimation from the Pelvis Using Radiological Methods: Turkish Sample

PELVİS’TEN RADYOLOJİK YÖNTEMLER İLE CİNSİYET TAYİNİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLEMİ

Öznur GÜLHAN
Pages
53–69
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to develop population specific sex estimation standards by using pelvic bones for Turkish population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sex estimation from skeletal remains is an important issue in both forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to this computerized tomography (CT) is recognized as a successful method in identification studies, and its use in the development of population-specific reference databases has increased in recent years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to develop population specific sex estimation standards by using pelvic bones for Turkish population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sex estimation from skeletal remains is an important issue in both forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology. The chances of achieving a high degree of accuracy in relation to the sex estimation is related to the degree of reliability of the techniques used to define the shape and size differences between the analyzed skeletal components and sexes. Currently pelvis is considered to be the most reliable sex indicator as it is the most sexually dimorphic element both morphologically and metrically, particularly in adult subjects. In addition to this computerized tomography (CT) is recognized as a successful method in identification studies, and its use in the development of population-specific reference databases has increased in recent years. The data of this study is consisted of five metric measurements taken from 3-dimensional pelvic images constructed from computed tomography images of 50 pelvic bones. The aim of this study is to develop population specific sex estimation standards by using pelvic bones for Turkish population.

Özet

İskelet kalıntılardan cinsiyet tayini hem adli antropoloji hem de biyoarkeolojideönemli bir konudur. Cinsiyet tahminine ilişkin yüksek düzeyde bir doğruluk eldeetme şansı, analiz edilen iskelet bileşeniyle ve cinsiyetler arasındaki şekil ve boyutfarklılıklarını tanımlamak için kullanılan tekniklerin güvenilirlik dereceleri ileilgilidir. Güncel görüş, Pelvisi en güvenilir cinsiyet göstergesi olarak kabuletmektedir, çünkü Pelvis özellikle yetişkin kişilerde hem morfolojik hem de metrikolarak en yüksek seksüel dimofizm gösteren kemiktir. Bununla birlikte,kimliklendirme çalışmalarında bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) başarılı bir yöntemolarak kabul görmekte ve son yıllarda popülasyona özgü referans veri tabanlarınınoluşturulmasında kullanımı oldukça artmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın verisini 50 Pelviskemiğinin bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri temel alınarak oluşturulan 3 boyutlupelvis görüntüleri üzerinden alınan beş metrik ölçüm oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanınamacı pelvis kemiği üzerinden Türkiye popülasyonuna özgü cinsiyet tayinistandartları geliştirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLHAN, Ö. (2022). Sex Estimation from the Pelvis Using Radiological Methods: Turkish Sample. Antropoloji, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 36, 53–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/447531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Asala, S. A. (2001). Sex determination from the head of the femur of South African whites and blacks, Forensic Science International 117(1), 15–22.
  2. Biwasaka, H., Aoki, Y., Sato, K., Tanijiri, T., Fujita, S., Dewa, K. ve Tomabechi, M. (2012). Analyses of sexual dimorphism of reconstructed pelvic computed tomography images of contemporary Japanese using curvature of the greater sciatic notch, pubic arch and greater pelvis, Forensic Science International 219(1–3), 288.e1-288.e8. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.032)
  3. Black, S. ve Ferguson, E. (2011). Forensic anthropology: 2000 to 2010.
  4. CRC Press.
  5. Decker, S. J., Davy‐Jow, S. L., Ford, J. M. ve Hilbelink, D. R. (2011). Virtual Determination of Sex: Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Adult Pelvis from 3D Computed Tomography Models, Journal of Forensic Sciences 56(5), 1107–1114.
  6. Fisher, R. A. (1940). The Precision of Discriminant Functions, Annals of Eugenics 10(1), 422–429. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1940.tb02264.x)
  7. Franklin, D., Cardini, A., Flavel, A. ve Marks, M. K. (2014). Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population, International Journal of Legal Medicine 128(5), 861–872.
  8. Garvin, H. M. (2012). “Adult Sex Determination: Methods and Application”. A Companion to Forensic, D. Dirkmaat (ed.), 239-247,
  9. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Gill, G. W. (2001). Racial variation in the proximal and distal femur: heritability and forensic utility, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(4), 791–799. Gómez-Valdés, J. A., Quinto-Sánchez, M., Menéndez Garmendia, A., Veleminska, J., Sánchez-Mejorada, G. ve Bruzek, J. (2012). Comparison of methods to determine sex by evaluating the greater sciatic notch: Visual, angular and geometric morphometrics, Forensic Science International 221(1–3), 156.e1- 156.e7. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.027) Gómez-Valdés, J. A., Ramírez, G. T., Molgado, S. B., Sain-Leu, P. H., Caballero, J. L. C. ve Sánchez-Mejorada, G. (2011). Discriminant Function Analysis for Sex Assessment in Pelvic Girdle Bones: Sample from the Contemporary Mexican Population, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(2), 297–301. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01663.x)
  10. Gonzalez, P. N., Bernal, V. ve Perez, S. I. (2009). Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis”, Forensic Science International 189(1–3), 68–74. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.012)
  11. İşcan, M. Y. ve Shihai, D. (1995). Sexual dimorphi