Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of bioelectrical impedance analysis for determining dry weight in pediatric hemodialysis patients; single center experience

Pages
184–188
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a high positive correlation between dry weights measured by BCMand dry weight established by nephrologists (r = 0.993, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Maintaining euvolemia is an important purpose in patients on hemodialysis therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Multiple-frequency bioimpedancespectroscopy (BIS) appears to be a useful and appropriate technique for assessing hydration status and body composition inhemodialysis patients.The aims of this study were to determine the pre and post hemodialysis hydration status of the pediatric hemodialysis patients by BIS and compare the dry weight determined by BIS to established by clinically.Material and Methods: Body Composition Monitor (BCM; Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) was performed in 13 pediatrichemodialysis patients in a single center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a high positive correlation between dry weights measured by BCMand dry weight established by nephrologists (r = 0.993, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Maintaining euvolemia is an important purpose in patients on hemodialysis therapy. Multiple-frequency bioimpedancespectroscopy (BIS) appears to be a useful and appropriate technique for assessing hydration status and body composition inhemodialysis patients.The aims of this study were to determine the pre and post hemodialysis hydration status of the pediatric hemodialysis patients by BIS and compare the dry weight determined by BIS to established by clinically.Material and Methods: Body Composition Monitor (BCM; Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) was performed in 13 pediatrichemodialysis patients in a single center. Patients were measured at the midweek session, once immediately before and once 30minutes after dialysis. Pre-and post-HD weights, blood pressures, were collected on the day of the BCM measurements.Results: Seven (53.8%) of the 13 patients were male and 6 (46.2%) were female. The mean age ranged from 11.92 ± 3.13 (5.7-16)years and duration time ranged from 7 to 54 months, and the median duration of dialysis was 11 months. Dry weights which wasdetermined clinically were higher than those calculated by BCM. A significant difference was found between mean values (34,71 ±12,68 versus 33,71 ± 12,16 kg, Δ: 1 ± 1,51, p = 0.035). There was a high positive correlation between dry weights measured by BCMand dry weight established by nephrologists (r = 0.993, p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAYA, O., NALÇACIOĞLU, H. (2022). Assessment of bioelectrical impedance analysis for determining dry weight in pediatric hemodialysis patients; single center experience. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 184–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/447420

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wizemann V, Wabel P, Chamney PW, Zaluska W, Moissl UM, Rode C, et al. The mortality risk of overhydration in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24(5):1574-9.
  2. Mamat R, Kong NC, Ba’in A, Shah SA, Cader R, Wong V, et al. Assessment of body fluid status in hemodialysis patients using the body composition monitor measurement technique. J Clin Nurs 2012;21(19-20):2879-85.
  3. Devolder I, Verleysen A, Vijt D, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W. Body composition, hydration, and related parameters in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patient. Perit Dial Int 2010;30(2):208-14.
  4. Spiegel DM, Bashir K, Fish B. Bioimpedance resistance ratios for the evaluation of dry weight in hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 2000;53(2):108-14.
  5. Mendley SR, Majkowski NL, Schoeller DA. Validation of estimates of total body water in pediatric dialysis patients by deuterium dilution. Kidney Int 2005;67(5):2056-62.
  6. Oh G, Wong C, Begin B, Salsbery K, Sutherland S, Chaudhuri A. Whole-body single-frequency bioimpedance analysis in pediatric hemodialysis patients. Pediatr Nephrol 2014;29(8):1417-23.
  7. Milani GP, Groothoff JW, Vianello FA, Fossali EF, Paglialonga F, Edefonti A, et al. Bioimpedance and Fluid Status in Children and Adolescents Treated With Dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2017;69(3):428-435.
  8. Zaloszyc A, Schaefer B, Schaefer F, Krid S, Salomon R, Niaudet P, et al. Hydration measurement by bioimpedance spectroscopy and blood pressure management in children on hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28(11):2169-77.
  9. Caravaca F, Martínez del Viejo C, Villa J, Martínez Gallardo R, Ferreira F. Hydration status assessment by multi-frequency bioimpedance in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Nefrologia 2011;31(5):537-44.
  10. Mulasi U, Kuchnia AJ, Cole AJ, Earthman CP. Bioimpedance at the bedside: current applications, limitations, and opportunities. Nutr Clin Pract 2015;30(2):180-93.
  11. Abbas SR, Liu L, Sipahioglu MH, Rosales L, Carter M, Kotanko P, et al. Comparison of bioimpedance techniques to detect changes in fluid status in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2014;37(1):48-56.
  12. Jaffrin MY, Morel H. Body fluid volumes measurements by impedance: A review of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) methods. Med Eng Phys 2008;30(10):1257-69.
  13. Chamney PW, Krämer M, Rode C, Kleinekofort W, Wizemann V. A new technique for establishing dry weight in hemodialysis patients via whole body bioimpedance. Kidney Int 2002;61(6):2250-8.
  14. Katzarski K, Charra B, Laurent G, Lopot F, Divino