SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the microvessel density of gastric regions in normal and sleeve gastrectomized rats

Ayse BAHAR CEYRAN
Huseyin UZUN
Sinan YOL
Suleyman ORMAN
Pages
589–593
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sleeve gastrectomy has no adverse effect on the microvessel density of the esophagogastric junction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Background: The aim of this study is to compare the microvessel densities of different normal gastric regions and to determine the effects of sleeve gastrectomy on the microvessel density of tissues alongside the remnant stomach.Material and Methods: Twenty male Wistar albino rats were divided into two groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Meanwhile, rats in the experiment group also underwent sleeve gastrectomy but were not sacrificed until the 5th postoperative day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sleeve gastrectomy has no adverse effect on the microvessel density of the esophagogastric junction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Background: The aim of this study is to compare the microvessel densities of different normal gastric regions and to determine the effects of sleeve gastrectomy on the microvessel density of tissues alongside the remnant stomach.Material and Methods: Twenty male Wistar albino rats were divided into two groups. Rats in the control group were immediately sleeve gastrectomized under anesthesia and a wedge resection of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), the fundus, corpus and antral gastric regions was performed, before sacrifice. Meanwhile, rats in the experiment group also underwent sleeve gastrectomy but were not sacrificed until the 5th postoperative day. At this point, gastric tissues alongside the sleeve gastrectomy area were then wedge-resected. The microvessel densities of these two groups were evaluated and compared.Results: When comparing distinctive gastric regions within the control group, the microvessel density of the esophagogastric junction was found to be less than in the corpus or fundus (20.04±4.45; 36.28±9.98, 39.4±9.57; p 0.05). The sleeve gastrectomy also had no significant effect on the microvessel densities at the esophagogastric junction or corpus (24.63±8.91, 22.24±7,63; p> 0.05).Conclusion: The esophagogastric junction has a lower microvessel density than the corpus in a normal stomach. Sleeve gastrectomy has no adverse effect on the microvessel density of the esophagogastric junction.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYRAN, A. B., UZUN, H., YOL, S., ORMAN, S. (2022). Comparison of the microvessel density of gastric regions in normal and sleeve gastrectomized rats. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 589–593. https://ajindex.com/articles/447414

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Thompson D, Wolf AM. The medical-care cost burden of obesity. Obes Rev 2001;2:189-97.
  2. Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA 2013;310:2416-25.
  3. Klimczak T, Klimczak J, Szewczyk T, et al. Endoscopic treatment of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using MEGA esophageal covered stents. Surg Endosc 2018;32:2038-45.
  4. Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, et al. The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies: The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 2016;264:464-73.
  5. Nielsen JS, McNagny KM. Novel functions of the CD34 family. J Cell Sci 2008;121:3683-92. Ramsden JD. Angiogenesis in the thyroid gland. J Endocrinol 2000;166:475-80.
  6. Turner HE, Harris AL, Melmed S, et al. Angiogenesis in endocrine tumors. Endocr Rev 2003;24:600-32.
  7. Yan B, Zhou Y, Feng S, et al. Β -Elemene-Attenuated Tumor Angiogenesis by Targeting Notch-1 in Gastric Cancer Stem-Like Cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013;2013:268468. Orman S, Karaman K, Basok BI, et al. Effects of thyroid hormone therapy on cut-surface healing of the remnant stomach with short-term weight loss alterations after sleeve gastrectomy. J Invest Surg 2017;16:1-10.
  8. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 1996;32:2474-84.
  9. Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, et al. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg 2004;14:1290-8.
  10. Lossa A, Abdelgawad M, Watkins BM, at al. Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016;401:757-66.
  11. Tonnesen MG, Feng X, Clark RA. Angiogenesis in wound healing. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 2000;5:40-6. Arcalís T, Carretero A, Navarro M, et al. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the subcardinal venous plexus of quail mesonephros: spatial and temporal morphological analysis. Anat Embryol 2002;205:19-28.
  12. Yoo JH, Shin JH, An MS, et al. adipose-tissue-derived stem cells enhance the healing of ischemic colonic anastomoses: an experimental study in rats. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2012;28:132-9. Bădescu A, Georgescu CV, Vere CC, et al. Correlations between Her2 oncoprotein, VEGF expression,