Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10

Rectum cancer: The effects of perioperative outcomes of patients as long-term prognostic factor

Pages
2126–2133
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These clinicalfactors are suitable to provide a good clinical guide to prognosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: After cancer treatment, patients and clinicians expect accurate prediction of long-term prognosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was todetermine which perioperative factors that may also be useful in determining long-term prognosis.Material and Methods: The data of rectum cancer patients operated on between 1998 and 2006 were retrospectively compared inrespect of clinicopathological and operative results, and long-term survival.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These clinicalfactors are suitable to provide a good clinical guide to prognosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: After cancer treatment, patients and clinicians expect accurate prediction of long-term prognosis. The aim of this study was todetermine which perioperative factors that may also be useful in determining long-term prognosis.Material and Methods: The data of rectum cancer patients operated on between 1998 and 2006 were retrospectively compared inrespect of clinicopathological and operative results, and long-term survival. Survival was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier method.Data thought to be associated with survival were subjected to univariate analysis followed by Cox proportion regression.Results: A total of 348 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 56 (±12) years in patients and 195 (56%) were malepatients. After retrospective evaluation of the database, the mean duration of disease-free survival was 54 (±50) months and themean duration of life was 60 (±48) months. There was no statistically significant correlation between gender, surgical procedure,histopathologic type of tumor, T level of the tumor, stage of the patient, ca 19-9 and mean life span. Grade, lymph node status andCEA were statistically correlated with survival time.Conclusion: We have demonstrated that grade, lymph node status and CEA are associated with long-term survival. These clinicalfactors are suitable to provide a good clinical guide to prognosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, A., CAMCI, C., BADEMCİ, R., BAYAR, Ö. Ö., DİNÇER, S. T., ERYAVUZ, M. Y. (2022). Rectum cancer: The effects of perioperative outcomes of patients as long-term prognostic factor. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10, 2126–2133. https://ajindex.com/articles/447399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Compton CC. Colorectal carcinoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and molecular features. Mod Pathol 2003;16:376-88
  2. How P, Shihab O, Tekkis P, et al. A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era. Surg Oncol 2011;20:149–55. 3- köhler l, Eypasch e, Paul a, et.al. Mythys in management of colorectal malignancy. Br J Surg 1997;84:248- 51
  3. O’ connel jb, liu jh, livingstone ehk. Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg 2003;69:866-72
  4. Kockerling F, Reymond MA, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Influence of surgery on metachronous distant metastases and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:324–9
  5. Singletary SE, Greene FL, Sobin LH. Classification of isolated tumor cells: clarification of the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. Cancer 2003 Dec 15;98:2740-1
  6. Mitry E, Benhamiche AM, Jouve JL, et al. Colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients under 45 years of age: comparison with older patients in well-defined French popülation. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:380-7
  7. Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, Gapstur SM. colon Cancer:a review of the epidemiology.epidemiol Rev 1993;15:499-545
  8. Sabıston textbook of surgery18 th edition heidi nelson and robert r. clima chapter 51;1433-7
  9. Mekele J, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Prognostic factors after surgery in patient younger than 50 years old with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:971-5
  10. Chung YF, Eu KW, Machin D, et al. Young age is not poor prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:1255-9
  11. Mehrkhani F1, Nasiri S, Donboli K, et al. Prognostic factors in survival of colorectal cancer patients after surgery Colorectal Dis 2009;11:157-61
  12. Sabiston textbook of surgery18 th edition heidi nelson and robert r. clima chapter 51;1433-7
  13. Moghimi Dehkordi B, Safaee A, et al. Prognostic factors in 1,138 Iranian colorectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:683-8
  14. McCormack PM, Ginsberg RJ. Current management of colorectal metastases to lung. Chest Surg Clin North Am 1998;8:119-26
  15. Nelson RL, Dollear T, Freels S, et al. The relation of age, race, and gender to the subsite location of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1998;82:1408-10
  16. Pietra n, Sarli l, Sansebastiano g, et al prognostic value of ploidy, cell proliferation kinetcs and conventional clinicopathologic criter