SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Retrospective evaluation of clinical and demographic features of 135 patients with lichen planus

Murat ÖZTÜRK
Hakim ÇELİK
Isa AN
Mustafa AKSOY
Pages
648–650
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More research which includes more patients is needed to better understand the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of LP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic, inflammatory, papulosquamous skin disease with different clinical features.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to determine the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with LP in our clinic.Material and Methods: We included 135 patients who applied to our clinic between January 2013 and December 2017 and who were diagnosed as LP by clinical and histopathological examination and who had HbsAg and Anti HCV tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More research which includes more patients is needed to better understand the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of LP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic, inflammatory, papulosquamous skin disease with different clinical features. The incidence varies according to the geographical regions, although it is seen all over the world and all races. In this study, it was aimed to determine the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with LP in our clinic.Material and Methods: We included 135 patients who applied to our clinic between January 2013 and December 2017 and who were diagnosed as LP by clinical and histopathological examination and who had HbsAg and Anti HCV tests. Patients’ age, sex, clinical variants of disease, mucosal involvement, nail involvement, HbsAg and Anti HCV tests were retrospectively recorded.Results: Of 135 patients included in the study, 68 (50.4%) were males and 67 (49.6%) females. The mean age of the patients ranged from 18 to 65 years, with a mean of 37.8 ± 12.7 years. Oral mucosal involvement was present in 30 (22.2%) patients and nail involvement in 10 (7.4%) patients. Classical LP was present in 111 of the patients (82.2%). HbsAg positivity was found in 3 of the patients (2.2%), but no anti HCV positivity was detected in any of the patients.Conclusion: The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the LP patients in our study were similar to the literature. More research which includes more patients is needed to better understand the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of LP.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, M., ÇELİK, H., AN, I., AKSOY, M. (2022). Retrospective evaluation of clinical and demographic features of 135 patients with lichen planus. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 648–650. https://ajindex.com/articles/447382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kusari A, Ahluwalia J. Lichen Planus. N Engl J Med 2018;379:567. Boyd AS, Neldner KH. Lichen planus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;25:593-619.
  2. Conte A, Inverardi D, Loconsole F, et al. A retrospective study of 200 cases of lichen. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 1990;125:85-9.
  3. Sanchez-Perez J, Rios Buceta L, Fraga J, et al. Lichen planus with lesions on the palms and/or soles:Prevalence and clinicopathological study of 36 patients. Br J Dermatol 2000;142 310-4.
  4. Payette MJ, Weston G, Humphrey S, et al. Lichen planus and other lichenoid dermatoses: Kids are not just little people. Clin Dermatol 2015;33:631-43.
  5. Manolache L, Seceleanu-Petrescu D, Benea V. Lichen planus patients and stressful events. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:437-41.
  6. Sen BB, Ekiz O, Rifaioglu EN, et al. Clinical and demographic characteristics of 165 patients with lichen planus. Dicle Med J. 2014;41:78-81
  7. Yanık ME, Aliagaoglu C, Turan H, et al. Retrospective evaluation of the patients with lichen planus followed in our clinic for the last ten years TAD 2012;10:6-11.
  8. Turan H, Baskan EB, Ercan G. Demographic characteristics in cases of lichen planus; examination of environmental factors related to disease. 22nd National Dermatology Congress, 14-18 October 2008.
  9. Konya, Turkey, 335 p.335 Kyriakis KP, Terzoudi S, Palamaras I, et al. Sex and age distribution of patients with lichen planus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:625-6.
  10. Anbar TE, Barakat M, Ghannam SF. A clinical and epidemiological study of lichen planus among Egyptians of al-Minya province. Dermatol Online J 2005;11:4 Strauss RA, Fattore L, Soltani K. The association of mucocutaneous lichen planus and chronic liver disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:406-10.
  11. Ingafou M, Leao JC, Porter SR, et al. Oral lichen planus: A retrospective study of 690 British patients. Oral Dis 2006;12:463-8.
  12. Xue JL, Fan MW, Wang SZ, et al. A clinical study of 674 patients with oral lichen planus in China. J Oral Pathol Med 2005;34:467-72.
  13. Akarsu S, Poyraz K, Yasar E, et al. Mucosal involvement frequency in lichen planus cases. DEU Med J 2007;21:155-7.
  14. An I, Demir V, Ibiloglu I, et al. Lichen planus secondary to rabies vaccination. Dermatol Online J 2017;23:13030 An I, Demir V, Akdeniz S. Lichenoid drug eruption induced by colchicine: case report. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2017;36:199-200.
  15. Denli YG, Durdu M, Karakas M. Diabetes and hepatitis frequency in 140 lichen planus cases in Cukurova region, J Dermatol 2004;31:293-8.
  16. Calista D, Morri M. Lichen planus