Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Teratogenic evaluation of drugs used by pregnant patients with gastrointestinal system diseases

Pages
751–755
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This permits decreasing the number of potential elective terminations related to the concerns about digestive system drugs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Drug use may be necessary in pregnant women due to chronic diseases or digestive disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of digestive system drugs during pregnancy.Material and Methods: In this observational study, we collected data of pregnant women who used gastrointestinal agents between 2014 and 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This permits decreasing the number of potential elective terminations related to the concerns about digestive system drugs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Drug use may be necessary in pregnant women due to chronic diseases or digestive disorders. However, safety of the use of many medications during pregnancy remains limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of digestive system drugs during pregnancy.Material and Methods: In this observational study, we collected data of pregnant women who used gastrointestinal agents between 2014 and 2018. Data regarding the medications, exposure to other agents and co-morbidities were documented. Our Teratology Information Service assessed the teratogenic risk of drugs. To investigate the pregnancy outcomes, a follow-up was conducted on the women after delivery to obtain whether there had been any major and/or minor congenital malformations and/or adverse neurodevelopmental effects in the infant.Results: Twelve pregnant women (age 27-34 years), whose gestational age were between 4 and 24 weeks at admission time, were followed up. Among patients, one woman with ulcerative colitis used azathioprine; two women with hepatitis B using tenofovir; three women with nausea and abdominal pain used metoclopramide, hyoscine, ondansetron; six women with dyspepsia and gastritis used alginic acid, antacids, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, trimebutine, alverine and pancreatin. After delivery, no congenital anomalies were detected. Two infants had low birth weights for gestational age, and one was born preterm.Conclusion: Data in our study contributes to the literature on safety of gastrointestinal system medications in pregnancy. This permits decreasing the number of potential elective terminations related to the concerns about digestive system drugs.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYKAN, D. A. (2022). Teratogenic evaluation of drugs used by pregnant patients with gastrointestinal system diseases. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 751–755. https://ajindex.com/articles/447249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Dathe K, Schaefer C. Drug safety in pregnancy: the German Embryotox institute. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2018;74:171-9.
  2. Spielmann K, Kayser A, Beck E, et al. Pregnancy outcome after anti-migraine triptan use: A prospective observational cohort study. Cephalalgia 2018;38:1081-92.
  3. Kaplan YC, Karadaş B, Küçüksolak G, et al. Counselling pregnant women at the crossroads of Europe and Asia: effect of Teratology Information Service in Turkey. Int J Clin Pharm 2017;39783-90.
  4. De Santis M, Straface G, Carducci B, et al. Risk of drug-induced congenital defects. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;117:10-9.
  5. Loane M, Dolk H, Kelly A, et al; Paper 4: EUROCAT statistical monitoring: identification and investigation of ten year trends of congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011;91:31-43.
  6. Githens Jh, Rosenkrantz Jg, Tunnock Sm. Teratogenic effects of azathioprine (imuran).J Pediatr 1965;66:959-61. Azathioprine.Reprotox. http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/micromedex2/librarian/CS/524F03/ND_PR/evidencexpert/ND_P/evidencexpert/DUPLICATIONSHIELDSYNC/739220/ND_PG/evidencexpert/ND_B/evidencexpert/ND_AppProduct/evidencexpert/ND_T/evidencexpert/PFActionId/evidencexpert.
  7. Davison JM, Dellagrammatikas H, Parkin JM. Maternal azathioprine therapy and depressed haemopoiesis in the babies of renal allograft patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:233-9.
  8. Durst JK, Rampersad RM. Pregnancy in women with solid-organ transplants: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2015;70:408-18.
  9. Flint J, Panchal S, Hurrell A, et al. BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group. BSR and BHPR guideline on prescribing drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding-Part I: standard and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:1693-7.
  10. Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, et al; American college of rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:797-808.
  11. Cleary BJ, Kallen B. Early pregnancy azathioprine use and pregnancy outcome. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009;85:647-54.
  12. Williams PL, Crain MJ, Yildirim C, et al; Congenital anomalies and in utero antiretroviral exposure in human immunodeficiency virus-exposed uninfected infants. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:48-55. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: Drug information. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate-drug-information?search=tenofovir&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_ty