Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Effects of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols on uterine markers

Pages
495–498
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More clinical trials are needed for these markers in order to increase live birth rates, implant success and to develop infertility treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is based on the development of multiple follicles in the same cycle as achieving the optimal number and quality of oocytes and is a common practice in infertility treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this application, clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins are the most commonly used agents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More clinical trials are needed for these markers in order to increase live birth rates, implant success and to develop infertility treatment.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is based on the development of multiple follicles in the same cycle as achieving the optimal number and quality of oocytes and is a common practice in infertility treatment. In this application, clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins are the most commonly used agents. These agents have some effects on reproductive tissues. Uterine tissue is susceptible to hormonal changes and undergoes a change in hormone action in terms of protein profile, secretory content and molecular structure during the menstrual cycle. In this review, it is aimed that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has effect onfemale reproductive organs with different markers and methods, how to gather information about where the change occurs due to the functions of these markers, and to present this information to scientists working in the field by being related to each other. It is seen that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation may have negative effects on many functions such as uterine growth, receptivity, and altered expressions of the markers. Articles in this review, it is generally recognized that the expression of a majority of receptiveproteins is decreased, which is thought to have an adverse effect on live birth rates and infertility treatment. More clinical trials are needed for these markers in order to increase live birth rates, implant success and to develop infertility treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELMAS, Ç., SAKİNER, L., BULUT, İ. D., YALCİNKAYA, P. (2022). Effects of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols on uterine markers. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 495–498. https://ajindex.com/articles/447240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ku SY, Choi YM, Suh CS, Kim SH, Kim JG, Moon SY, et al. Effect of superovulation on the expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase- 3 in the murine endometrium. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;55(1):1-6.
  2. Leco KJ, Edwards DR, Schultz GA. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 is the major metalloproteinase inhibitor in the decidualizing murine uterus. Mol Reprod Dev 1996;45(4):458-65.
  3. Noci I, Borri P, Coccia ME, Criscuoli L, Scarselli G, Messeri G, et al. Hormonal patterns, steroid receptors and morphological pictures of endometrium in hyperstimulated IVF cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;75(2):215-20.
  4. Bourgain C, Ubaldi F, Tavaniotou A, Smitz J, Steirtephem V, Devroey P. Endometrial hormone receptors and proliferation index in the periovulatory phase of stimulated embryo transfer cycles in comparison with natural cycles and relation to clinical pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2002;78(2):237-44.
  5. Chai J, Lee KF, Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Ovarian stimulation modulates steroid receptor expression and spheroid attachment in peri-implantation endometria: studies on natural and stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril 2011;96(3):764-8.
  6. Lin ZL, Ni HM, Liu YH, Sheng XH, Cui XS, Kim NH et al. Effect of anti-PMSG on distrubution of estrogen receptor alpha and progesterone receptor in Mouse ovary, oviduct and uterus. Zygote 2014;23(5):695-703.
  7. Bayard F, Damılano S, Robel P, Baulieu EE. Cytoplasmic and nuclear estra- diol and progesterone receptors in human endometrium. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 1978;46(4):635-48.
  8. Lindsay LA, Murphy CR. Ovarian hyperstimulation affects fluid transporters in the uterus: A potential mechanism in uterine receptivity. Reprod Fertil Dev 2012;26(7):982-90. Skowronski MT. Distribution and quantitative changes in amounts of aquaporin 1, 5 and 9 in the pig uterus during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy.Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010;8:109. Hildenbrand A, Lalitkumar L, Nielsen S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Stavreus-Evers A. Expression of aquaporin 2 in human endometrium. Fertil Steril 2006;86(5):1452-8.
  9. He RH, Sheng JZ, Luo Q, Jin F, Wang B, Qian YL et al. Aquaporin - 2 expression in human endometrium correlates with serum ovarian steroid hormones. Life Sci 2006;79(5):423-9.
  10. He RH, Gao HJ, Li YQ, Zhu XM. The associated factors to endometrial cavity fluid and the relevant impact on the IVFET outcome.Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010;8:46. Jovanovic A, Kramer B. The effect of hyperstimulation on transforming growth factor b1 and b2 in the rat ute