SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10

Comparison of the effects of variables in sperm preparation techniques on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination

Nevin KOCAMAN
Pages
2328–2332
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study investigated the effects of technical changes applied to sperm preparation techniques on pregnancyrates in both groups.Results:A significant difference was found between the clinical pregnancy rates of the two groups with regard to the numbers ofpatients and IUI cycles (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To investigate the effects of two sperm preparation techniques, density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up, on thepregnancy rates per cycle and per group in two intrauterine (IUI) cycles.Material and Methods: The retrospective study reviewed 634 patients who presented to Firat University Medical School Hospital andunderwent a total of 1,032 IUI cycles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group I consisted of 306 (48.3%) patients who underwent a total of 524 IUI cycles betweenJanuary 2012 and January 2016 and Group II included 328 (51.7%) patients who underwent a total of 508 IUI cycles between April 2015and January 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study investigated the effects of technical changes applied to sperm preparation techniques on pregnancyrates in both groups.Results:A significant difference was found between the clinical pregnancy rates of the two groups with regard to the numbers ofpatients and IUI cycles (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of two sperm preparation techniques, density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up, on thepregnancy rates per cycle and per group in two intrauterine (IUI) cycles.Material and Methods: The retrospective study reviewed 634 patients who presented to Firat University Medical School Hospital andunderwent a total of 1,032 IUI cycles. Group I consisted of 306 (48.3%) patients who underwent a total of 524 IUI cycles betweenJanuary 2012 and January 2016 and Group II included 328 (51.7%) patients who underwent a total of 508 IUI cycles between April 2015and January 2019. The study investigated the effects of technical changes applied to sperm preparation techniques on pregnancyrates in both groups.Results:A significant difference was found between the clinical pregnancy rates of the two groups with regard to the numbers ofpatients and IUI cycles (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAMAN, N. (2022). Comparison of the effects of variables in sperm preparation techniques on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10, 2328–2332. https://ajindex.com/articles/447180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Fritz AM, Speroff L. Assisted reproductive technologies. in: clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 8thth edition. Philadeıphia,: Lippincott Williams 2011;1331-83
  2. Tarlatzis BC, Bontis J, Kolibianakis EM, et al. Mantalenakis S.evaluation of intrauterine insemination with washed spermatozoa from the husband in the treatment of infertility. Hum Reprod 1991;6: 1241-46
  3. Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, et al. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1892-1896
  4. Rappa KL, Rodriguez HF, Hakkarainen GC, et al. Sperm processing for advanced reproductive technologies: Where are we today? Biotechnol Adv 2016;34:578-87
  5. Paasch U, Grunewald S, Glander HJ. Sperm selection in assisted reproductive techniques. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2007;65:515-25
  6. Özkavukçu S, Aras D. Sperm Preparation Methods for IUI and IVF. TJRMS 2017;1:92-8
  7. Mortimer D. Sperm recovery techniques to maximize fertilizing capacity. Reprod Fertil Def 1994;6:25-31
  8. Agarwal A, Nallella KP, Allamaneni SS, et al. Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: an overview of the literatüre. Reprod Biomed 2004;8:616- 27
  9. O’Flaherty C, Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Positive role of reactive oxygen species in mammalian sperm capacitation: triggering and modulation of phosphorylation events. Free Radic Biol Med 2006;41:528–40
  10. Said TM, Agarwal A, Sharma RK. Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertil Steril 2003;79:829–43
  11. Benchaib M, Braun V, Lornage J, et al.Guerin JF. Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1023-8
  12. Henkel R, Kierspel E, Stalf T, et al. Schill WB, kruger TF. effect of reactive oxygen species produced by spermatozoa and leucocytes on sperm functions in non-leukocytospermic patients. Fertil Steril 2005;83:635-42
  13. Henkel RR, Schill WB. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003;1:108-29
  14. Enginsu ME, Pieters MH, Dumolin JC, et al. Male factor as determinant of in vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1136-40
  15. Amiri I, Ghorbani M, Heshmati S. Comparison of the DNA fragmentation and the Sperm parameters after processing by the density gradient and the swim-up methods. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6:1451-3
  16. Tomlinson MJ, Moffatt O, Manicardi GC,, et al. Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA dama