SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Constrained liner use of developing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: Short-term results

Turan Cihan DÜLGEROĞLU
Pages
724–727
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Neurovascular injury complications were not observed in patients.Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with hip arthroplasty procedure with the constrained implant used in our study obtained satisfactory results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Today total hip arthroplasty is one of the surgical procedures with the most satisfying data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this retrospective study is to present the clinical outcomes of freedom constrained lıner systems in patients developing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.Material and Methods: The aim of our study was to present clinical outcomes of fifteen consecutive surgical procedures with freedom anti-luxation revision system (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) from March 2014 to December 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Neurovascular injury complications were not observed in patients.Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with hip arthroplasty procedure with the constrained implant used in our study obtained satisfactory results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Today total hip arthroplasty is one of the surgical procedures with the most satisfying data. In spite of all these good outcomes, difficult and upsetting complications for patient and surgeon may be encountered after total hip arthroplasty. Constrained liner were developed to reduce the risk for primary total hip arthroplasty patients with cognitive function disorder before surgery and patients with re-dislocation risks. The aim of this retrospective study is to present the clinical outcomes of freedom constrained lıner systems in patients developing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.Material and Methods: The aim of our study was to present clinical outcomes of fifteen consecutive surgical procedures with freedom anti-luxation revision system (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) from March 2014 to December 2018. Patients were assessed with Harris hip score, Oxford score and Charnley score and early period complications and satisfaction outcomes were evaluated.Results: Only one of the fifteen patients developed complications of intraoperative femur shaft fracture. According to postoperative data of early period outcomes, postoperative Harris hip score and Oxford scores were observed to have significant amelioration. No deep or superficial wound site complications developed. Neurovascular injury complications were not observed in patients.Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with hip arthroplasty procedure with the constrained implant used in our study obtained satisfactory results.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜLGEROĞLU, T. C. (2022). Constrained liner use of developing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: Short-term results. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 724–727. https://ajindex.com/articles/447175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century:total hip replacement. Lancet 2007;370:1508-19
  2. Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M, et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:410-6
  3. Iorio R, Robb WJ, Healy WL, et al. Orthopaedic surgeon workforceand volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg 2008;90:1598-605
  4. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg 2007;89:780-5
  5. Tsukada S, Wakui M. Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five-year-average follow-up results. Open Orthop J 2015;9:157-62
  6. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, et al. The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:9-14
  7. Cullen C, Johnson DS, Cook G. Re-admission rates within 28 days of total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 2006;88:475-8
  8. Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI. The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:86-90
  9. Brooks PJ. Dislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures. BoneJoint J 2013;95-B:67-69. 10. de Palma L, Procaccini R, Soccetti A, et al. Hospital cost of treating early dislocation following hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2012;22:62-7
  10. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, et al. An analysis of the risk ofhip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;447:19-23
  11. Meek RM, Allan DB, McPhillips G, et al. Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 2006;447:9-18
  12. Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1202-10
  13. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:282-8
  14. Scifert CF, Noble PC, Brown TD, et al. Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Orthop Clin North Am 2001;32:553-67
  15. Su EP, Pellicci PM. The role of constrained liners in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;420:122-9
  16. Murray