Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 8

Determinants of the hand functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Pages
1493–1497
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistically significant positivecorrelation was found between hand functions measured by DHI and morning stiffness, HAQ-DI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) hand,VAS global, DAS 28 and pinch (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the hand function determinants and related factors of the patients with rheumatoidarthritis (RA).Material and Methods: Thirty nine patients with long standing rheumatoid arthritis were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Disease acitivity was calculated by using Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistically significant positivecorrelation was found between hand functions measured by DHI and morning stiffness, HAQ-DI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) hand,VAS global, DAS 28 and pinch (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the hand function determinants and related factors of the patients with rheumatoidarthritis (RA).Material and Methods: Thirty nine patients with long standing rheumatoid arthritis were included in the study. Demographic, clinicaland laboratory findings of the patients were recorded. Duruoz Hand Index Data (DHI) was used for the assessment of the handfunctions. Disease acitivity was calculated by using Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28. In order to evaluate general disability, HealthAssessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) was used. Grip and pinch strengths of the patients were measured by theJamar dynamometer.Results: Among all the patients, 82.1% were women. Mean age of the patients were 58.03±13.11 years. Mean disease durationwas 9.69 ± 8.96 years. Mean grip strength was 16.58±6.74 kg and pinch strength was 4.80±1.75 kg. Statistically significant positivecorrelation was found between hand functions measured by DHI and morning stiffness, HAQ-DI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) hand,VAS global, DAS 28 and pinch (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMUS, E., PAKER, N., GÖKŞENOĞLU, G., BUĞDAYCI, D. (2022). Determinants of the hand functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 8, 1493–1497. https://ajindex.com/articles/447174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Grassi W, De Angelis R, Lamanna G, et al. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol 1998;27:S18-24
  2. Dellhag B, Bjelle A. A five-year followup of hand function and activities of daily living in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1999;2:33-41
  3. Ertel AN. Flexor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid arthritis. Hand Clin 1989;5:177-90
  4. Horsten NC, Ursum J, Roorda LD, et al. Prevalence of hand symptoms, impairments and activity limitations in rheumatoid arthritis in relation to disease duration. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:916-21
  5. Ursum J, Horsten NC, Hoeksma AF, et al. Predictors of stenosing tenosynovitis in the hand and hand-related activity limitations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:96-100
  6. Mathiesen FK, Rasmussen OJ, Recht L, et al. Impairment of grip function in rheumatoid arthritis – studies with a simple hand test. Scand J Rheumatol 1991;20:209-12
  7. Duruöz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, et al. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1167-72
  8. Fraser A, Vallow J, Preston A, et al. Predicting ‘normal’ grip strength for rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38:521-8
  9. Saraux A, Guedes C, Allain J, et al. From classification criteria to diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1996;63:159-61
  10. Van Beers-Tas MH, Marotta A, Boers M, et al. A prospective cohort study of 14-3-3η in ACPA and/or RF-positive patients with arthralgia. Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:76
  11. Van der Heijde DM, van’t Hof MA, Van Riel PL, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 1990;49:916-20
  12. Küçükdeveci A, Şahin H, Ataman Ş, et al. Issue in crosscultural validity: 201 example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the stanford health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:14-9
  13. Bruce B, Fries JF. The stanford health assessment questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 2003;30:167-78
  14. Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 1981;40:87-99
  15. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, et al. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2006;9