Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 7

Is fixation suture necessary in undescended testicle surgery?

Pages
1275–1278
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, we recommend the use of other techniques that do not include parenchymal suture fixation during orchiopexy,and avoiding the routine use of testicular parenchymal sutures if possible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: It is still controversial whether or not testicular fixation is required for undescended testes surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimedto compare the results of the patients with undescended testis in a single center, who underwent orchiopexy with or withouttransfixation suture.Material and Methods: The medical records of the patients with undescended testes who were operated at our tertiary pediatricsurgery department were retrospectively analyzed between July 2015 and November 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, we recommend the use of other techniques that do not include parenchymal suture fixation during orchiopexy,and avoiding the routine use of testicular parenchymal sutures if possible.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: It is still controversial whether or not testicular fixation is required for undescended testes surgery. In this study, we aimedto compare the results of the patients with undescended testis in a single center, who underwent orchiopexy with or withouttransfixation suture.Material and Methods: The medical records of the patients with undescended testes who were operated at our tertiary pediatricsurgery department were retrospectively analyzed between July 2015 and November 2018. Patients were divided into two groupsas fixation performed (Group 1) and not performed (Group 2). Group 1 included n=30 patients (40 testes) and Group 2 included n=41patients (49 testes). The age of the patients, type of undescended testis, surgical technique and complication rates were determinedResults: The mean age of the patients was 37.2 (12-104) months in Group 1 and 41.2 (12-110) months in Group 2. In both groups,complications such as recurrence, testicular atrophy, testis torsion, and hernia or hydrocele formation were not observed. Onepatient in Group 2 developed wound infection, which was recovered with antibiotic treatment.Conclusion: As a result of the short-term follow-up of our study, there was no clinically significant difference between the twogroups. Therefore, we recommend the use of other techniques that do not include parenchymal suture fixation during orchiopexy,and avoiding the routine use of testicular parenchymal sutures if possible.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKKAYA, M. E., AKÇORA, B., ATICI, A. (2022). Is fixation suture necessary in undescended testicle surgery?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 7, 1275–1278. https://ajindex.com/articles/447124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abdelhalim A, Chamberlin JD, McAleer IM. A Survey of the current practice patterns of contralateral testis fixation in unilateral testicular conditions. Urology 2018;116:156-60
  2. Thong M, Lim C, Fatimah H. Undescended testes: incidence in 1,002 consecutive male infants and outcome at 1 year of age. Pediatr Surg Int 1998;13:37-41 3. Surer I, Demirbag S, Ozturk H, et al. Effects of testicular fixation on oxidative stress-related parameters in prepubertal rat testis. Arch Androl 2006;52:71-8
  3. Büyükünal E, Büyükünal SN. Erişkin yaş testis tümörlerinin inmemiş testisle ilişkisi üzerine bir çalışma.Çocuk cerrahisi dergisi. 2017;31:71-5 5. Kozminski David J, Kate HK, David AB. “Orchiopexy without transparenchymal fixation suturing: a 29-year experience.” J Urol 2015;194:1743-7
  4. Coughlin MT, Bellinger MF, LaPorte RE, et al. Testicular suture: A significant risk factor for intertility among formerly cryptorchid men. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1790-3
  5. Lotan G, Golan R, Efrati Y, et al. An experimental study of the effect of two distinct surgical techniques of orchiopexy on spermatogenesis and testicular damage in cryptorchid testes. Fertil Steril 2005; 84:749-55
  6. Cobellis G, Noviello C, Nino F, et al. Spermatogenesis and cryptorchidism. Front Endocrinol 2014;5:63
  7. Ribeiro CT, De Souza DB, Costa WS, et al. Effects of testicular transfixation on seminiferous tubule morphology and sperm parameters of prepubertal, pubertal, and adult rats. Theriogenology. 2015;84:1142-8
  8. Steinbecker KM, Teague JL, Wiltfong, et al. Testicular histology after transparenchymal fixation using polytetrefluoroethylene suture: An animal model. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1822-5
  9. Ritchey ML, Bloom DA. Modified dartos pouch orchiopexy. Urology 1995;45:136–8
  10. Hoseinpour M, Memarzadeh M, Sadeqi A. Comparative investigation of two surgical techniques of orchiopexy in the post-operative recurrence rate and testicular size in children in clinical trial study. Adv Biomed Res 2015;4:171 13. Mazaris E, Tadtayev S, Shah T. A novel method of scrotal orchidopexy: description of the technique and short-term outcomes. BJU Int 2012;110:1838-42
  11. Ghnnam WM, Saed B, Ghazy H. A modified technique for scrotal fixation during orchiopexy. African J Paediat Surg. 2011;8:203
  12. Curling TB: A Practical Treatise on the Disease of the Testis, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott & Co 1866; pp. 12e55
  13. Meyer T, Hocht B. Long term results of orchidopexy: transscrotal fixation versus Dartos-pouch