Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Radiological determination of safe and adequate corpectomy limits in the cervical region

Pages
854–858
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These parameters should be taken into consideration during anterior corpectomy toobtain more secure and effective decompression.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This manuscript aims to display the relationship between the vertebral artery and its surrounding structures to maintain safeand effective corpectomy during anterior C4, C5, and C6 decompressive surgery.Material and Methods: Fifty patients who applied to the emergency department and received a cervical computed tomography(CT) scan were included, and their C4, C5, and C6 vertebrae margins were measured.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The following distances were measured: thedistance between the medial wall of the vertebral foramen and lateral border of the anterior arch of the vertebral corpus, the distancebetween the junction of the corpus-the pedicle and inferior border of the vertebral foramen, the distance between the medial borderof the vertebral foramen and longus colli muscles, the distance between each vertebral foramen, and the bipedicular distance.Results: Fifty patients (22 females and 28 males) were assessed in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These parameters should be taken into consideration during anterior corpectomy toobtain more secure and effective decompression.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This manuscript aims to display the relationship between the vertebral artery and its surrounding structures to maintain safeand effective corpectomy during anterior C4, C5, and C6 decompressive surgery.Material and Methods: Fifty patients who applied to the emergency department and received a cervical computed tomography(CT) scan were included, and their C4, C5, and C6 vertebrae margins were measured. The following distances were measured: thedistance between the medial wall of the vertebral foramen and lateral border of the anterior arch of the vertebral corpus, the distancebetween the junction of the corpus-the pedicle and inferior border of the vertebral foramen, the distance between the medial borderof the vertebral foramen and longus colli muscles, the distance between each vertebral foramen, and the bipedicular distance.Results: Fifty patients (22 females and 28 males) were assessed in this study. The female and male populations had mean ages of52.4 and 53.9 years, respectively. All measurements were higher in the lower vertebrae than those in the upper vertebrae. Also allthese measurements were found higher in males than females. The following results were reported: a value: C4, 4.1/4.3 (F/M); C5,4.6/4.9; and C6, 5/5.2 mm; b value: C4, 4.5/4.7; C5, 4.8/5.1; and C6, 5.1/5.5 mm; c value: C4, 8.6/9; C5, 9/9.6; and C6, 9.3/10.1 mm; dvalue: C4, 23.1/24; C5, 23.9/25.2; and C6, 24.5/25.5 mm; e value: C4, 19.3/20.4; C5, 20/21; and C6, 20.5/21.7 mm.Conclusion: The Distances between the vertebral artery and the surrounding structures and muscles will provide the surgeon a saferworking during anterior corpectomy surgery. These parameters should be taken into consideration during anterior corpectomy toobtain more secure and effective decompression.

🔖

Cite This Article

SENTURK, S. (2022). Radiological determination of safe and adequate corpectomy limits in the cervical region. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 854–858. https://ajindex.com/articles/447122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervicalspine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J. Bone Joint Surg Am 1958;40:607- 24
  2. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J. Neurosurg 1958;15:602-17
  3. Steinmetz MP, Stewart TJ, Kager CD, et al. Cervical deformity correction. Neurosurgery 2007;60:90-7
  4. Tan LA, Riew KD, Traynelis VC. Cervical spine deformity- Part 2: Management algorithm and anterior techniques. Neurosurgery 2017;81:561-7
  5. Miller JA, Lubelski D, Alvin MD, et al. C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression and fusion: cost and quality-of-life implications. Spine J 2014;14:2854-60
  6. Minhas SV, Chow I, Jenkins TJ, at el. Preoperative predictors of increased hospital costs in elective anterior cervical fusions: a single-institution analysis of 1,082 patients. Spine J 2015;15:841-8
  7. Nandyala SV, Elboghdady IM, Marquez-Lara A,et al. Cost analysis of incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E1042-E51
  8. Lunardini DJ, Eskander MS, Even JL, et al. Vertebral artery injuries in cervical spine surgery. Spine J 2014;14:1520-5
  9. Rampersaud YR, Moro ER, Neary MA, et al. Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1503-10
  10. Daentzer D, Deinsberger W, Boker DK. Vertebral artery complications in anterior approaches to the cervical spine: report of two cases and review of literature. Surg Neurol 2003;59:300-9
  11. Burke JP, Gerszten PC, Welch WC. Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine J 2005;5:508-14
  12. Fassett DR, Dailey AT, Vaccaro AR. Vertebral artery injuries associated with cervical spine injuries: a review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:252-8
  13. Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, et al. Anatomical gender differences in cervical vertebrae of size-matched volunteers, Spine 2008;33:E44-9
  14. David E, Youssef M, Khalil S, et al. Demographical aspects in cervical vertebral bodies’ size and shape (c3-c7): a skeletal study. Spine J 2017;17:135-142
  15. Herzo RG, Wiens JJ, Dillingham MF, et al. Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players. Plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, Spine 1991;16:S178-86.