SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

The comparison of postoperative wound healing following different gingivectomy techniques: A randomized prospective clinical trial

Süleyman BOZKAYA
Berceste GÜLER
Sila Cagri IŞLER
Ahu URAZ
Fitnat Deniz CETİNER
Pages
382–388
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On postoperative day 3 and day 5, the SG pain scores were significantly higher than those from the CG; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the LG and CG.Conclusion: Aspect to controlled gingival tissue removing than diode laser and postoperative inflammation and wound healing values were observed almost equal with diode laser value; so ceramic gingiva burs may be an alternative treatment that is comparatively easier to implement and provide faster gingival recovery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aims of this study were to examine the degree of clinical discomfort condition experienced by patients and to improve wound healing by dental researcher throughout two weeks after gingivectomy treatment.Material and Methods: Forty-one patients suffering from gingival overgrowth were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The postoperative evaluating parameters as pain, burning, bleeding, epithelization, carbonization is recorded and standardized photographs were taken at 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th days postoperatively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On postoperative day 3 and day 5, the SG pain scores were significantly higher than those from the CG; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the LG and CG.Conclusion: Aspect to controlled gingival tissue removing than diode laser and postoperative inflammation and wound healing values were observed almost equal with diode laser value; so ceramic gingiva burs may be an alternative treatment that is comparatively easier to implement and provide faster gingival recovery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aims of this study were to examine the degree of clinical discomfort condition experienced by patients and to improve wound healing by dental researcher throughout two weeks after gingivectomy treatment.Material and Methods: Forty-one patients suffering from gingival overgrowth were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups for gingivectomy technique defined as; scalpel group (SG), ceramic rotary bur group (CG) and diode laser group (LG). The postoperative evaluating parameters as pain, burning, bleeding, epithelization, carbonization is recorded and standardized photographs were taken at 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th days postoperatively. All photographs were examined by the image analyzing software program.Results: The percentage of epithelization in the CG group is higher than the SG and LG group, but this value is not statistically significant on postoperative day 3. The LG group showed statistically significantly lower epithelization value on postoperative day 5. On postoperative day 1, VAS pain scores were significantly higher in the SG than in the LG; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the SG and CG. On postoperative day 3 and day 5, the SG pain scores were significantly higher than those from the CG; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the LG and CG.Conclusion: Aspect to controlled gingival tissue removing than diode laser and postoperative inflammation and wound healing values were observed almost equal with diode laser value; so ceramic gingiva burs may be an alternative treatment that is comparatively easier to implement and provide faster gingival recovery.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKAYA, S., GÜLER, B., IŞLER, S. C., URAZ, A., CETİNER, F. D. (2022). The comparison of postoperative wound healing following different gingivectomy techniques: A randomized prospective clinical trial. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 382–388. https://ajindex.com/articles/447092

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ryu SW, Lee SH, Yoon HJ. A comparative histological and immunohistochemical study of wound healing following incision with a scalpel, CO2 laser or Er,Cr:YSGG laser in the guinea pig oral mucosa. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70:448-54
  2. Aykol G, Baser U, Maden I, et al. The effect of low-level laser therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment. J Periodontol 2011;82:481-8
  3. Esposito M, Maghaireh H, Grusovin MG, et al. Soft tissue management for dental implants: what are the most effective techniques? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2012;5:221-38
  4. Ribeiro FV, Hirata DY, Reis AF, et al.Open-flap versus flapless esthetic crown lengthening: 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2014;85:536-44
  5. Kreisler M, Al Haj H, d’Hoedt B. Clinical efficacy of semiconductor laser application as an adjunct to conventional scaling and root planing. Lasers Surg Med 2005;37:350-5
  6. Lopes BM, Theodoro LH, Melo RF, et al. Clinical and microbiologic follow-up evaluations after non-surgical periodontal treatment with erbium:YAG laser and scaling and root planing. J Periodontol 2010;81:682-91
  7. Favia G, Tempesta A, Limongelli L, et al. Diode laser treatment and clinical management of multiple oral lesions in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:379-83
  8. Romanos G, Nentwig GH. Diode laser (980 nm) in oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: clinical observations based on clinical applications. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999;17:193-7
  9. Smith KC. Ignorance of photobiology: a major pitfall in using lasers in medicine. Pain 1991;47:243-5
  10. Harris DM. Editorial comment biomolecular mechanisms of laser biostimulation.J Clin Laser Med Surg 1991;9:277-80
  11. Tomasi C, Schander K, Dahlén G, et al. Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance. J Periodontol 2006;77:111-8
  12. Gupta G, Kumar A, Khatri M, et al. Comparison of two different depigmentation techniques for treatment of hyperpigmented gingiva. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:705-9
  13. Amaral MB, de Ávila JM, Abreu MH, et al. Diode laser surgery versus scalpel surgery in the treatment of fibrous hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:1383-9
  14. Haytac MC, Ozcelik O. Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: a comparison of carbon dioxide laser and scalpe