SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9

The frequency of paranasal pathologies and variations in patients with migraine and their effects on patients’ pain experience

Ali Haydar BAYKAN
Emre GEDİK
Ali Zeynel Abidin TAK
Pages
1907–1912
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is consideredthat there is a need for longitudinal and multi-centered studies regarding the matter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of paranasal pathologies and variations in migraine patients, and also whether suchsituations have an effect on the strength and frequency of pain attacks that the patients experienced.Materials and Methods: Patients between 18 and 58 years old were included in the study who were diagnosed as migraine accordingto International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 beta criteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The images of patients whose axial and coronal brainCT examination were done are prospectively examined.Results: Totally 130 migraine patients were included in the study as 112 women (86.2%) and 18 men (13.8%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is consideredthat there is a need for longitudinal and multi-centered studies regarding the matter.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of paranasal pathologies and variations in migraine patients, and also whether suchsituations have an effect on the strength and frequency of pain attacks that the patients experienced.Materials and Methods: Patients between 18 and 58 years old were included in the study who were diagnosed as migraine accordingto International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 beta criteria. The images of patients whose axial and coronal brainCT examination were done are prospectively examined.Results: Totally 130 migraine patients were included in the study as 112 women (86.2%) and 18 men (13.8%). The average age ofthe patients was found as 32.5±10.4. Migraine with aura was observed in 31 of the cases (23.8%) and migraine without aura wasobserved in 99 (76.2%). It is found that the rate of paranasal pathology and / or variation in the patients with migraine as 76.9% intotal.Conclusion: It is thought that paranasal regions should be evaluated carefully during the evaluation of brain imaging studies in termsof differential diagnosis of paranasal pathologies that may differ in treatment and prognosis in migraine patients. It is consideredthat there is a need for longitudinal and multi-centered studies regarding the matter.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYKAN, A. H., GEDİK, E., TAK, A. Z. A. (2022). The frequency of paranasal pathologies and variations in patients with migraine and their effects on patients’ pain experience. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9, 1907–1912. https://ajindex.com/articles/447083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aradi M, Schwarcz A, Perlaki G, et al. Quantitative MRI studies of chronic brain white matter hyperintensities in migraine patients. Headache 2013;53:752-63
  2. Erdemoğlu AK, Ocaklılar EK, Yılmaz S. Evaluation of changes in cerebral structures in migraine patients with diffusion and perfusion MRI. Turk J Neurol 2013;19:44-51
  3. Raschi E, Poluzzi E, De Ponti F. Stroke, migraine and triptans: from bedside to bench. EBio Medicine 2016; 6: 14–15
  4. Kowalska M, Prendecki M, Kozubski W, et al. Molecular factors in migraine. Oncotarget 2016;2;7:50708-18
  5. Lemos C, Neto JL, Pereira-Monteiro J, et al. A role for endothelin receptor type A in migraine without aura susceptibility? A study in Portuguese patients. Eur J Neurol 2011;18:649-55
  6. Avci AY, Lakadamyali H, Arikan S, et al. High sensitivity C-reactive protein and cerebral white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging in migraine patients. J Headache Pain 2015;16:9
  7. Headache Classification committee of the international headache society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33: 629-808
  8. Tak AZA, Sengül Y, Bilak Ş. Evaluation of white matter hyperintensities and retinal fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, inner-plexiform layer, and choroidal layer in migraine patients. Neurol Sci 2018 9. Night YE, Kaube H, Bartsch T, et al. Effect on trigeminal firing PQ-type calcium channels in the periaquaductal grey. Cephalalgia 2001;281:5
  9. Buzzi G, Moskowitz M. The pathophysiology of migraine. J Headache Pain 2005;6:105-11
  10. Sherifa A. Hamed. The vascular risk associations with migraine: Relation to migraine susceptibility and progression. J Atherosclerosis 2009;205:15-22
  11. Standring, Susan. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Forty-first edition. New York: Elsevier Limited 2016; NLM ID: 101667594 13. Yousem DM. Imaging of sinonasal inflammatory disease. Radiology 1993;188:303-14
  12. Zinreich SJ. Abidin M, Kennedy DW. Ross-sectronal imaging of then asalcavity and paranasal sinuses. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;1:94-8
  13. Cantone E, Castagna G, Ferranti I, et al. Concha bullosa related headache disability. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:2327-30
  14. Dasar U, Gokce E. Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography. World J Radiol. 2016;28;8:98- 108
  15. Hewaidi G, Omami G. Anatomic variation of sphenoid sinus and related structures in libyan po