Clinical benefits of shock index and modified shock index in pulmonary embolism for 30-day mortality prognosis

The values showing the severity of the disease were evaluated.Result When all the parameters were examined, the predictive power of deaths within 30 days was significant at differing degrees(p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: It was evaluating the shock index and the modified shock index, which are strongly correlated with the severity of the shock.Determining the risk analysis in terms of early mortality of patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) in order tospecify treatment options and prognosis.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Therefore, we evaluated the shock index and the modified shockindex, which are strongly correlated with the severity of the shock.Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism were screened retrospectively between January 2012 andDecember 2017.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:The values showing the severity of the disease were evaluated.Result When all the parameters were examined, the predictive power of deaths within 30 days was significant at differing degrees(p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2012 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: It was evaluating the shock index and the modified shock index, which are strongly correlated with the severity of the shock.Determining the risk analysis in terms of early mortality of patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) in order tospecify treatment options and prognosis. Therefore, it is important to determine the severity of pulmonary embolism correctly.The available algorithms, such as the pulmonary embolism severity index, provide a prediction of the patients according to clinicalfindings. These algorithms score abnormal vital signs, medical findings, age, and comorbid diseases. However, vital signs innormal physiological limits cause errors in determining the severity of the disease. In this case, the problem is a lack of correlationbetween the severity of the disease and vital signs. Consequently, we need a more reliable parameter. In our study, we searched fora parameter that can be calculated easily in a dynamic manner, and which is not affected by normalized vital signs. We attemptedto find a parameter that could indicate the severity of the disease. Therefore, we evaluated the shock index and the modified shockindex, which are strongly correlated with the severity of the shock.Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism were screened retrospectively between January 2012 andDecember 2017. A total of 99 patients whose pulmonary embolism was confirmed by angio-thoracic tomography were included inthe study. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured in these patients. Mean arterial pressure, shock index andthe modified shock index were also calculated. The values showing the severity of the disease were evaluated.Result When all the parameters were examined, the predictive power of deaths within 30 days was significant at differing degrees(p

🔖

Cite This Article

PAYZA, U., TOPAL, F. E., KARAKAYA, Z., AKYOL, P. Y., TAHTACI, R., KAYALI, A., BİLGİN, S. (2022). Clinical benefits of shock index and modified shock index in pulmonary embolism for 30-day mortality prognosis. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9, 1885–1889. https://ajindex.com/articles/447082

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

Janata K, Holzer M, Domanovits H, Met al. Mortality Of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2002
72 2. Pines JM, Mullins PM, Cooper JK, et al. National Trends in emergency department use, care patterns, and quality of care of older adults in the united states. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013
Platts-Mills TF, Travers D, Biese K, et al. Accuracy of the Emergency Severity Index triage instrument for identifying elder emergency department patients receiving an immediate life-saving intervention. Acad Emerg Med 2010
Liu YC, Liu JH, Fang ZA, et al. World J modified shock index and mortality rate of emergency patients. Emerg Med 2012
Singh A, Ali S, Agarwal A, et al. Correlation of shock index and modified shock index with the outcome of adult trauma patients: a prospective study of 9860 patients. N Am J Med Sci 2014
Konstantinides S, Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism: risk assessment and management. Eur Heart J 2012
Bertoletti L, Le Gal G, Aujesky D, et al. Prognostic value of the geneva prediction rule in patients with pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med 2011
Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2010
Righini M, Roy PM, Meyer G, Simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI): validation of a clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2011
Jeffrey A. Kline, MD, Diane M. et al. Normalization of vital signs does not reduce the probability of acute pulmonary embolism in symptomatic emergency department patients. Academıc Emerg Med 2012
Kenneth T. Horlander, David M. et al. Pulmonary embolism mortality in the United States, 1979-1998: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. Arch Intern Med 2003
Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the simplired D-Dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000
416–20. 13. Kline JA, Corredor DM, Hogg MM, et al. Normalization of vital signs does not reduce the probability of acute pulmonary embolism in symptomatic emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2012
Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG. Acute pulmonary embolism: part i: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circula