Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Evaluation of psychological stress and cortisol levels in males with and without gingivitis

Pages
1459–1464
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, BECK depression inventory(BDI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) were recorded from all participants.Results: PI, GI, BOP (p0.05).Conclusion: Psychological stress and cortisol levels in GCF and saliva were found to be similar in males with and without gingivitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Gingivitis is a prevalent health problem seen most commonly in males.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, to evaluate the possible role of stress in gingivitis, this study investigated the psychological stress and cortisol levelsin males with and without gingivitis.Material and Methods: Sixty systemically healthy males between 18 and 28 years were divided into two groups, including those withgeneralized gingivitis (G) (n=30) and periodontally healthy controls (H) (n=30).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, BECK depression inventory(BDI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) were recorded from all participants.Results: PI, GI, BOP (p0.05).Conclusion: Psychological stress and cortisol levels in GCF and saliva were found to be similar in males with and without gingivitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Gingivitis is a prevalent health problem seen most commonly in males. Psychological stress is also associated with periodontaldisease. Thus, to evaluate the possible role of stress in gingivitis, this study investigated the psychological stress and cortisol levelsin males with and without gingivitis.Material and Methods: Sixty systemically healthy males between 18 and 28 years were divided into two groups, including those withgeneralized gingivitis (G) (n=30) and periodontally healthy controls (H) (n=30). Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and saliva sampleswere obtained for determination of cortisol levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Plaque (PI) and gingival index (GI),bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were noted. In addition, BECK depression inventory(BDI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) were recorded from all participants.Results: PI, GI, BOP (p0.05).Conclusion: Psychological stress and cortisol levels in GCF and saliva were found to be similar in males with and without gingivitis.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAL, K., MİLWARD, M. R., COOPER, P. R., GÜLER, Ö. Ç. (2022). Evaluation of psychological stress and cortisol levels in males with and without gingivitis. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 1459–1464. https://ajindex.com/articles/447060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Preshaw PM. Detection and diagnosis of periodontal conditions amenable to prevention. BMC Oral Health, 2015;15:5
  2. Leishman SJ, Seymour GJ, Ford PJ. Local and systemic inflammatory responses to experimentally induced gingivitis. Dis Markers 2013;35:543-9
  3. Ericsson JS, Abrahamsson KH, Ostberg AL, et al. Periodontal health status in Swedish adolescents: an epidemiological, cross-sectional study. Swed Dent J 2009;33:131-9
  4. Albandar JM, Streckfus CF, Adesanya MR, et al. Cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking as risk factors for periodontal disease and tooth loss. J Periodontol 2000;71:1874-81
  5. Lang WP, Farghaly MM, Ronis DL. The relation of preventive dental behaviors to periodontal health status. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:194-8
  6. Furuta M, Ekuni D, Irie K, et al. Sex differences in gingivitis relate to interaction of oral health behaviors in young people. J Periodontol 2011;82:558-65
  7. Aleksejunniene J, Holst D, Eriksen HM, et al. Psychosocial stress, lifestyle and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:326-35
  8. Peruzzo DC, Benatti BB, Ambrosano GM, et al. A systematic review of stress and psychological factors as possible risk factors for periodontal disease. J Periodontol 2007;78:1491-504
  9. Sheiham A, Nicolau B. Evaluation of social and psychological factors in periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000 2005;39:118-31
  10. Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME. Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol Bull 2004;130:355-91
  11. Cakmak O, Alkan BA, Ozsoy S, et al. Association of gingival crevicular fluid cortisol/ dehydroepiandrosterone levels with periodontal status. J Periodontol 2014;85:287-94
  12. Richter P, Werner J, Heerlein A, et al. On the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory. A review. Psychopathology 1998;31:160-8
  13. Lee EH. Erratum to review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nurs Res 2013;7:160
  14. Kuoppala R, Napankangas R, Raustia A. Quality of Life of Patients Treated With Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures Evaluated With the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14): a Survey of 58 Patients. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013;4:4
  15. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy. Ii. Correlation between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35
  16. Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol 1967;38:610- 6
  17. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals