Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 8

Evaluation of quality of life with Alzheimer disease

Pages
1468–1473
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fall in quality of life appears to be parallel to increasing disease stage, disease duration, patient age and low educational level, living outside their own home and care support needs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In our study, the aim was to assess quality of life and associated factors among patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and to collect data about reducing the disease load.Material and Methods: Our study was performed with 117 patients with possible AD diagnosis according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) diagnostic criteria and 102 healthy individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Whoqol-Brief (WB) was used to assess quality of life of individuals in the AD and control groups, while the Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QOL-AD) scale was also administered to patients with AD.Results: There were no significant differences between the AD and control groups in terms of sex and gender (p=0.952; 0.186).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fall in quality of life appears to be parallel to increasing disease stage, disease duration, patient age and low educational level, living outside their own home and care support needs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In our study, the aim was to assess quality of life and associated factors among patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and to collect data about reducing the disease load.Material and Methods: Our study was performed with 117 patients with possible AD diagnosis according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) diagnostic criteria and 102 healthy individuals. The Whoqol-Brief (WB) was used to assess quality of life of individuals in the AD and control groups, while the Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QOL-AD) scale was also administered to patients with AD.Results: There were no significant differences between the AD and control groups in terms of sex and gender (p=0.952; 0.186). In the AD group, points obtained in all WB areas were found to be significantly low compared to the control group (p=0.000). With increasing disease stage, disease duration and patient age, the WB subareas and QOL-AD patient/family/weighted points were observed to display a statistically significant level of decrease (p=0.000). All WB areas and QOL-AD patient/family/weighted points for those who were illiterate, received care support and lived with children or relatives (apart from QOL-AD family) were found to be statistically significant low compared to those who were literate, had attended primary/middle and high school, lived on their own and did not receive care support (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our data show that the quality of life of patients with AD is low. The fall in quality of life appears to be parallel to increasing disease stage, disease duration, patient age and low educational level, living outside their own home and care support needs.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZAR, T., YAZAR, H. O. (2022). Evaluation of quality of life with Alzheimer disease. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 8, 1468–1473. https://ajindex.com/articles/447052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kumar P, Tiwari SC, Goel A, et al. Novel occupational therapy interventions may improve quality of life in older adults with dementia. Int Arch Med 2014;7:26
  2. Mate KE, Pond CD, Magin PJ, et al. Diagnosis and disclosure of a memory problem is associated with quality of life in community based older Australians with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:1962-71
  3. Duggleby WD, Swindle J, Peacock S, et al. A mixed methods study of hope, transitions, and quality of life in family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Geriatr 2011;11:88
  4. Yazar T, Yazar HO, Demir EY, et al. Assessment of the mental health of carers according to the stage of patients with diagnosis of Alzheimer-type dementia. Neurol Sci 2018;39:903-8
  5. Olgun Yazar H, Yazar T, Günday A, ve ark. Sağlık kurulunda nörolojik hastalıkları nedeniyle ağır özürlü olarak değerlendirilen hastaların bakım verenlerinin ruh sağlığı durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Symrna Med J 2018;1;1-10
  6. WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Evaluation of the General Edition. 1996. https: //www.who. int / mental_health / media / en / 76.pdf? ua = 1. Field Trial Edition December 1996. Mental health world health organization, Geneva. https: //www.who. int / mental_health / media / en / 76.pdf? ua =1
  7. Field Trial WHOQOL-100 February 1995. 100 questions with response scale. Mental health organization, Geneva.
  8. Kahle-Wrobleski K, Ye W, Henley D, et al. Assessing quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2016;6:82-90
  9. Lucas-Carrasco R, Skevington SM, Gómez-Benito J, et al. Using the WHOQOL-BREF in persons with dementia: a validation study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2011;25:345-51
  10. Olgun Yazar H, Yazar T, Yancar Demir E, et al. Assessment of mental health of carers according to patient stage of idiopathic parkinson’s disease. Ideggyogy Sz 2018;71:205-12
  11. Eser E. Fundamentals of conceptual isuues and measurement of health related quality of life. Turkish J Neurol 2014;1:1-4
  12. Aydemir Ö. Use of quality of life in clinicial practice. Turkish J Neurol 2014;1:5-9
  13. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease Neurol 1984;34:939-44