Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10

Effect of transforaminal hypertonic saline on the treatment of lumbar herniated discs: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Pages
2352–2358
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Complications were recorded in both groups.Results: TFESI with or without adjuvant hypertonic saline was found to be effective by achieving a significant reduction in NRSand ODI scores during the overall follow-up period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of adding hypertonic saline to conventional transforaminal epidural steroidinjections (TFESIs) in the management of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with radicular pain.Material and Methods: The study included 57 patients with L4–L5 LDH treated with TFESI.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into two groups:the hypertonic (n = 29) and conventional groups (n = 28).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Complications were recorded in both groups.Results: TFESI with or without adjuvant hypertonic saline was found to be effective by achieving a significant reduction in NRSand ODI scores during the overall follow-up period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of adding hypertonic saline to conventional transforaminal epidural steroidinjections (TFESIs) in the management of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with radicular pain.Material and Methods: The study included 57 patients with L4–L5 LDH treated with TFESI. The patients were divided into two groups:the hypertonic (n = 29) and conventional groups (n = 28). The conventional group was administered with triamcinolone, bupivacaine,and isotonic saline. Subsequently, the hypertonic group was administered with triamcinolone, bupivacaine, and 10% hypertonicsaline. The patients were followed up using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Substantial andmoderate responder ratios were achieved using NRS. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, one, three, six, and ninemonths. Complications were recorded in both groups.Results: TFESI with or without adjuvant hypertonic saline was found to be effective by achieving a significant reduction in NRSand ODI scores during the overall follow-up period. Reduction of NRS scores at six- and nine-month follow-up and ODI scores atnine-month follow-up in the hypertonic group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group. Moreover, substantialresponse in the hypertonic group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group. Both groups had no complications.Conclusion: The administration of adjuvant 10% hypertonic saline to transforaminal injections enhances the treatment efficacy byincreasing pain reduction and improving the quality of life in the late follow-up period.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOLGUN, M., ÖZÖNER, B. (2022). Effect of transforaminal hypertonic saline on the treatment of lumbar herniated discs: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10, 2352–2358. https://ajindex.com/articles/447028

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Grantham SA. Herniated lumbar disc. Am J Surg.1952;83:531–7
  2. Jordan J, Konstantinou K. O’Dowd J. Herniated lumbar disc. BMJ Clin Evid 2011;2011:1118
  3. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, et al. Lumbar disc nomenclature: Version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American spine society, the american society of spine radiology, and the american society of neuroradiology. Spine J 2014;14:2525-45
  4. Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:598-603
  5. Heliövaara M, Knekt P, Aromaa A. Incidence and risk factors of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:251-8
  6. Chen KY, Shaparin N, Gritsenko K. Low back pain. In: Yong RJ, Nguyen M, Nelson M eds. Pain Medicine: An Essential Review. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 461-3
  7. Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Clinical practice herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. N Engl J Med 2016;37:1763-72
  8. Rivera CE. Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2018;29:73-92
  9. Petersen BD, Davis KW, Choi J. Epidural steroid injections. In: Ray JR, Charles E, eds. Pain Management in Interventional Radiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p.112-17
  10. Jeong HS, Lee JW, Kim SH, et al. Effectiveness of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection by Using a Preganglionic Approach: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Radiology 2007;245:584-90
  11. Lee JH, An JH, Lee SH. Comparison of the effectiveness of interlaminar and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Clin J Pain 2009;25:206-10
  12. Candido KD, Raghavendra MS, Chinthagada M, et al. A prospective evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns with fluoroscopically guided lumbar epidural steroid injections: The lateral parasagittal interlaminar epidural approach versus the transforaminal epidural approach. Anesth Analg 2008;106:638-44
  13. Tong YCI, Yong RJ. Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. In: Yong RJ, Nguyen M, Nelson M eds. Pain Medicine: An Essential Review.Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 223-5
  14. Rados I, Sakic K, Fingler M, et al. Efficacy of Interlaminar vs Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Unilateral Radicular Pain: Prospective, Randomized Study. Pain Med