SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 7

The effect of artificial anal band on quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence

Ebru ASMAZ
Asım CİNGİ
Pages
1289–1294
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean±SD pre-operative CCIS decreased significantly (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence levels before and after implantation of an artificial anal band (AAB), and toevaluate the change in quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence.Material and Methods: Patients with fecal incontinence who underwent AAB implantation were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CleavelandClinic/Wexner Incontinence Score (CCIS) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) scales were evaluated before, 2 weeks and5 years post-implantation.Results: Eight patients underwent AAB implantation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean±SD pre-operative CCIS decreased significantly (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence levels before and after implantation of an artificial anal band (AAB), and toevaluate the change in quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence.Material and Methods: Patients with fecal incontinence who underwent AAB implantation were included in the study. The CleavelandClinic/Wexner Incontinence Score (CCIS) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) scales were evaluated before, 2 weeks and5 years post-implantation.Results: Eight patients underwent AAB implantation. The mean±SD pre-operative CCIS decreased significantly (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ASMAZ, E., CİNGİ, A. (2022). The effect of artificial anal band on quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 7, 1289–1294. https://ajindex.com/articles/447011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, et al. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995;274:559-61
  2. Ho YH, Muller R, Veitch C, et al. Faecal incontinence: an unrecognised epidemic in rural North Queensland? Results of a hospital-based outpatient study. Aust J Rural Health 2005;13:28-34
  3. Siproudhis L, Pigot F, Godeberge P, et al. Defecation disorders: a French population survey. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:219-27
  4. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ. Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med J Aust 2002;176:54-7
  5. Enck P, Bielefeldt K, Rathmann W, et al. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:143-6
  6. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, et al. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002;50:480-4
  7. Nelson RL. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126:S3-7 8. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:33-6
  8. Bharuca AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, et al. Symptoms and quality of life in community women with fecal incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1004-9
  9. Dunivan GC, Heymen S, Palsson OS, et al. Fecal incontinence in primary care: prevalence, diagnosis, and health care utilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:493.e1-6
  10. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, et al. Reliability and validity of the standardized mini mental state examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in turkish population. Turkish J Psych 2002;13:273-81
  11. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77-97
  12. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:9-17
  13. Dedeli O, Fadiloglu C, Bor S. Validity and reliability of a turkish version of the fecal incontinence quality of life scale. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009;36:532-8
  14. Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F, et al.Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2001;88:1481-6
  15. Lehur PA, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S, et al. Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. A single institution report. Int J Colorectal