SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidineremifentanil and propofol-remifentanil combinations on postoperative cognitive functions in patients undergoing hysteroscopy: A randomized prospective study

Celaleddin SOYALP
Nurcin GULHAS
Idris ATASOY
Pages
1094–1099
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg bolus 0.04 μg /kg/min infusion was administered to thegroups, and the groups were followed to ensure RSS≥4.Result: In cognitive functions, it was observed that there was significant regression in Group PR in postoperative period comparedto the preoperative period (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In the present study, we aimed to compare Dexmedetomidine-Remifentanil and Propofol-Remifentanil combinations in termsof postoperative cognitive functions in hysteroscopy attempts.Material and Methods: A total of 70 ASA I-II patients who were aged between 18 and 65 years were included in the study followingthe ethics committee approval.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were randomized into two groups (n=35), and standard routine monitoring were appliedto them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg bolus 0.04 μg /kg/min infusion was administered to thegroups, and the groups were followed to ensure RSS≥4.Result: In cognitive functions, it was observed that there was significant regression in Group PR in postoperative period comparedto the preoperative period (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In the present study, we aimed to compare Dexmedetomidine-Remifentanil and Propofol-Remifentanil combinations in termsof postoperative cognitive functions in hysteroscopy attempts.Material and Methods: A total of 70 ASA I-II patients who were aged between 18 and 65 years were included in the study followingthe ethics committee approval. The patients were randomized into two groups (n=35), and standard routine monitoring were appliedto them. The sedation depth was evaluated with Ramsey Sedation Score (RSS) before and after the sedation; and cognitive functionsof the groups were evaluated with the Minimal Mental State Test (MMST).Propofol 1 mg/kg bolus 25-100 μg/kg/min infusion was administered to Group PR, and Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus 0.4-0.7 μg/kg/h infusion dose was administered to Group DR. Remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg bolus 0.04 μg /kg/min infusion was administered to thegroups, and the groups were followed to ensure RSS≥4.Result: In cognitive functions, it was observed that there was significant regression in Group PR in postoperative period comparedto the preoperative period (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYALP, C., GULHAS, N., ATASOY, I. (2022). Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidineremifentanil and propofol-remifentanil combinations on postoperative cognitive functions in patients undergoing hysteroscopy: A randomized prospective study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6, 1094–1099. https://ajindex.com/articles/446976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Visnovsky J, Zubor P, Galo S, et al. Validity of hysteroscopy in clinical setting: single centre analysis of 605 consecutive hysteroscopies. Ceska Gynekol 2008;73:365-9
  2. Kabli N, Tulandi T, A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:308-10
  3. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Mikhail MS, et al. Morgan & Mikhail’s clinical anesthesiology. New York, N.Y.: McGraw- Hill Education LLC.; https://accessmedicine.mhmedical. com/book.aspx?bookid=564https://. Available from: 2013 4. Benedict P, Tremper KJLD, Brown D. Anesthesiology, Firsth edition. Pennsylvania: The Mcgraw-Hill Company. The anesthetic plan for healthy patients 2008:68-87
  4. Tang JF, Chen PL, Tang EJ, et al. Dexmedetomidine controls agitation and facilitates reliable, serial neurological examinations in a non-intubated patient with traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2011;15:175-81
  5. Buiza C,Yanguas J, Zulaica A, et al. [Overal cognitive assessment in Basque-speaking people with advanced dementia. Validation to the Basque language of the Severe Mini-Mental State Examination SMMSE (SMMSE-eus)]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2018;53:208-12
  6. SavinoF,VaglianoL, Ceratto S, et al. Pain assessment in children undergoing venipuncture: the Wong-Baker faces scale versus skinconductance fluctuations. Peer J 2013;37:1-5
  7. Favilli A, Mazzon I, Gerli S. Pain in office hysteroscopy: it is not just a matter of size. Comment on: “Paulo AA, Solheiro MH, Paulo CO. Is pain better tolerated with minihysteroscopy than with conventional device? A systematic review and meta-analysis: hysteroscopy scope size and pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 May 7”. 2016;293:687
  8. Paulo AA, Solheiro MH, Paulo CO. Is pain better tolerated with mini-hysteroscopy than with conventional device? A systematic review and meta-analysis: hysteroscopy scope size and pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:987-94
  9. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, et al. Klinik anesteziyoloji. Ankara: Güneş; 2004. p. 1041 11. Balcı C, Karabekir S, Kuru İ, et al. Monitörize anestezi bakımında propofol ve dekmedotomidinin hemodinamik ve bispektral indeks değerleri açısından karşılaştırılması 2006;14:90-4
  10. Kaygusuz K, Gokce G, Gursoy S, et al. A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008;106:114-9
  11. Ramsay MA, Saha D, Hebeler RF. Tracheal resection in the morbidly obese patient: the role o