SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Bone decortication rate and guided bone regeneration under an occlusive titanium dome: Micro-CT analysis

Ümit YOLCU
Ahmet Huseyin ACAR
Pages
329–334
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also more bone decortication rate seems to be more effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to evaluate how the rate of bone decortication influences guided bone regeneration.Material and Methods: Twenty-four titanium domes were placed bilaterally on the parietal bones of sixteen New Zealand rabbits after drilling the bone with a small round burr to induce bleeding from the marrow space (Group A: one hole; Group B: three holes; Group C: nine holes), while the bone surface was left intact at the control sites (Control group).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bone decortication rates were approximately 4% in group A, 12% in group B, and 36% in group C.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also more bone decortication rate seems to be more effective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate how the rate of bone decortication influences guided bone regeneration.Material and Methods: Twenty-four titanium domes were placed bilaterally on the parietal bones of sixteen New Zealand rabbits after drilling the bone with a small round burr to induce bleeding from the marrow space (Group A: one hole; Group B: three holes; Group C: nine holes), while the bone surface was left intact at the control sites (Control group). Each group included six samples. Bone decortication rates were approximately 4% in group A, 12% in group B, and 36% in group C. All rabbits were killed after a 12-week bone-healing period, and results were evaluated by micro-CT.Results: Both newly generated tissue formation and mineralized bone formation were higher in all experimental groups than in the control group (P < 0.05), increasing in proportion to the increasing number of holes to a peak in Group C.Conclusion: Bone decortication improves mineralized bone and newly regenerated augmented tissue during guided bone regeneration. Bone decortication can be used as an integral part of guided bone regeneration procedures. Also more bone decortication rate seems to be more effective.

🔖

Cite This Article

YOLCU, Ü., ACAR, A. H. (2022). Bone decortication rate and guided bone regeneration under an occlusive titanium dome: Micro-CT analysis. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 329–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/446967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J, et al. The role of bone decortication in enhancing the results of guided bone regeneration: a literatüre review. J Periodontol 2009;80:175-89
  2. Abrahamsson P, Isaksson S, Gordh M, et al. Onlay bone grafting of the mandible after periosteal expansion with an osmotic tissue expander: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1404-10
  3. Marechal M, Eyckmans J, Schrooten J, et al. Bone augmentation with autologous periosteal cells and two different calcium phosphate scaffolds under an occlusive titanium barrier: an experimental study in rabbits. J Periodontol 2008;79:896-904
  4. Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Takahashi K, et al. Enhancement of bone volume in guided bone augmentation by cell transplants derived from periosteum: an experimental study in rabbit calvarium bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:308-14
  5. Ozdemir H, Ezirganli S, Isa Kara M, et al. Effects of platelet rich fibrin alone used with rigid titanium barrier. Arch Oral Biol 2013;58:537-44
  6. Van Steenberghe D, Johansson C, Quirynen M, et al. Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:63-71
  7. Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Hammerle CH, et al. Influence of decortication of the donor bone on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit skull bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:99-106
  8. Tamura T, Fukase Y, Goke E, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation for augmented bone using guided bone regeneration. J Periodontal Res 2005;40:269-76
  9. Schmid J, Hammerle CH, Olah AJ, et al. Membrane permeability is unnecessary for guided generation of new bone. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:125-30
  10. Marechal M, Luyten F, Nijs J, et al. Histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography of bone augmentation under a titanium membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:708-14
  11. Kochi G, Sato S, Fukuyama T, et al. Analysis on the guided bone augmentation in the rat calvarium using a microfocus computerized tomography analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:42-8
  12. Verdugo F, D’Addona A, Pontón J. Clinical, tomographic, and histological assessment of periosteal guided bone regeneration with cortical perforations in advanced human critical size defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:112-20
  13. Hammerle CH, Schmid J, Olah AJ, et al. A novel model system for the study of experimental guided bone formation in humans. Cl