Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Our experience of endovascular treatment in coronary subclavian steal syndrome with a review of the literature

Pages
366–369
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, surgical therapeutic alternatives are still important for patients in whom success cannot be achieved with the endovascular method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endovascular treatment in patients with coronary subclavian steal syndrome.Material and Methods: The archive records for six patients diagnosed with coronary subclavian steal syndrome and treated using the endovascular method between January 2012 and August 2017 were examined retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data concerning diagnosis and treatment were recorded and evaluated in the light of the current literature.Results: All patients had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery at external centers a mean 5.7 years previously.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, surgical therapeutic alternatives are still important for patients in whom success cannot be achieved with the endovascular method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endovascular treatment in patients with coronary subclavian steal syndrome.Material and Methods: The archive records for six patients diagnosed with coronary subclavian steal syndrome and treated using the endovascular method between January 2012 and August 2017 were examined retrospectively. Data concerning diagnosis and treatment were recorded and evaluated in the light of the current literature.Results: All patients had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery at external centers a mean 5.7 years previously. Angiography revealed severe stenosis in the proximal subclavian artery in three patients and total occlusion in three. One hundred percent success was achieved in the three patients with stenosis by establishing full patency by means of a stent procedure. Full patency was also established in two of the three patients with total occlusion using the stent procedure. The symptoms of the five patients treated successfully resolved post-procedurally. No restenosis findings were encountered at clinical and Doppler ultrasonography follow-ups.Conclusion: While surgical options predominated in the early years in the treatment of coronary subclavian steal syndrome, endovascular techniques are widely employed today. However, surgical therapeutic alternatives are still important for patients in whom success cannot be achieved with the endovascular method.

🔖

Cite This Article

HEMSİNLİ, D., ERDEN, T. (2022). Our experience of endovascular treatment in coronary subclavian steal syndrome with a review of the literature. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 366–369. https://ajindex.com/articles/446965

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Harjola PT, Valle M. The importance of aortic arch or subclavian angiography before coronary reconstruction. Chest 1974;66:436-8
  2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Cooley DA Duncan JM, et al. Brachiocephalic reconstruction I: operative and long-term results for complex disease. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:47-54
  3. Vecera J, Vojtísek P, Varvarovský I, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary-subclavian steal: role of the Doppler ultrasound. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11:E34
  4. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Cooley DA, et al. Myocardial thievery: the coronary subclavian steal syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:386-92
  5. Lobato EB, Kern KB, Bauder-Heit J, et al. Incidence of coronary-subclavian steal syndrome in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001;15:689-92
  6. Palchik E, Bakken AM, Wolford HY, et al. Subclavian artery revascularization: an outcome analysis based on mode of therapy and presenting symptoms. Ann Vasc Surg 2008;22:70-8
  7. Prasad A, Prasad A, Varghese I, et al. Prevalence and treatment of proximal left subclavian artery stenosis in patients referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol 2009;133:109-11
  8. Kırali K, Mansuroğlu D, Erentuğ V, et al. Combined revascularitation of subclavian artery and coronary artery. Turkish J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 2000;8:777-80
  9. Ochi M, Hatori N, Hinokiyama K, et al. Subclavian artery reconstruction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;9:57-61
  10. Bryan FC, Allen RC, Lumsden AB. Coronary-subclavian steal syndrome: report of five cases. Ann Vasc Surg 1995;9:115-22
  11. Elian D, Gerniak A, Guetta V, et al. Subclavian coronary steal syndrome: an obligatory common fate between subclavian artery, internal mammary graft and coronary circulation. Cardiology 2002;97:175-9
  12. Chan-Tack KM. Subclavian steal syndrome: a rare but important cause of syncope. South Med J 2001;94:445-7
  13. Qi L, Gu Y, Zhang J, et al. Surgical treatment of subclavian occlusion. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010;24:1030–2
  14. Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Feldhaus RJ, et al. Long-term results and outcomes of crossover axilloaxillary bypass grafting: A 24-year experience. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:894-901
  15. Hadjipetrou P, Cox S, Piemonte T, et al. Percutaneous revascularization of atherosclerotic obstruction of aortic arch vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1238-45
  16. Wilms G, Baert A, Dewaele D, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the subclavian a