Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9

The investigation of the prevalence of condylar degenerative changes and its relationship with disc displacement in the magnetic resonance images of the patients with temporomandibular joint disorders

Pages
2020–2025
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Advancing disc displacementcauses condylar degenerative changes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between TMJ disc displacement and chondylar degenerativechanges.Material and Methods: The MRIs of 182 TMJs belonging to 91 patients with TMD were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:TMJs were distributed into threegroups according to the disc positions as normal disc position (Group 1, n=39), disc displacement with reduction (Group 2, n=49) anddisc displacement without reduction (Group 3, n=94).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Advancing disc displacementcauses condylar degenerative changes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between TMJ disc displacement and chondylar degenerativechanges.Material and Methods: The MRIs of 182 TMJs belonging to 91 patients with TMD were evaluated. TMJs were distributed into threegroups according to the disc positions as normal disc position (Group 1, n=39), disc displacement with reduction (Group 2, n=49) anddisc displacement without reduction (Group 3, n=94). Condylar degenerative change is diagnosed according to presence or absenceof erosion, sclerosis, flattening and osteophyte encountered in MRI. When more than one type of degenerative change was observed,the joint was determined to have degenerative changes.Results: The results of MRI evaluation of 182 TMJs revealed Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 in 39 (21.4%), 49 (26.9%) and 94(51.6%) joints, respectively. No degenerative condyle was found in 107 (58.8%) joints whereas degenerative condylar changes wereencountered in 75 (41.2%) of 182 TMJs by the MRI evaluation. Condyle degeneration was detected in 2 (5.1%) of the joints withnormal disc position whereas 6 (12.2%) and 67 (71.3%) of the joints with reducing and non-reducing disc displacement revealedcondyle degeneration, respectively.Conclusion: A statistically significantly higher rate of condyle degeneration was encountered in the joints with disc displacementwithout reduction than the joints with disc displacement with reduction and normal disc position. Advancing disc displacementcauses condylar degenerative changes.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, G. S., BAYRAMOĞLU, Z., OGUL, H., YAVUZ, G. Y. (2022). The investigation of the prevalence of condylar degenerative changes and its relationship with disc displacement in the magnetic resonance images of the patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9, 2020–2025. https://ajindex.com/articles/446948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Orsini MG, Kuboki T, Terada S, et al. Clinical predictability of temporomandibular joint disk displacement. J Dent Res 1999;78:650-60
  2. Roh HS, Kim W, Kim YK, et al. Relationships between disk displacement, joint effusion, and degenerative changes of the TMJ in TMD patients based on MRI findings. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2012;40:283-86
  3. Emshoff R, Brandlmaier I, Bertram S, et al. Relative odds of temporomandibular joint pain as a function of magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement, osteoarthrosis, effusion, and bone marrow edema. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:437-45
  4. Grossmann E, Remedi MP, Ferreira LA, et al. Magnetic Resonance Image Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Osteophytes: Influence of Clinical Factors and Artrogenics Changes. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:334-38
  5. Campos MIG, Campos PSF, Cangussu MCT, et al. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and pain in temporomandibular joints with and without degenerative changes of the condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:529-34
  6. Dias IM, Coelho PR, Picorelli Assis NMS, et al. Evaluation of the correlation between disc displacements and degenerative bone changes of the temporomandibular joint by means of magnetic resonance images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:1051-57
  7. Cortés D, Exss E, Marholz C, et al. Association Between Disk Position and Degenerative Bone Changes of the Temporomandibular Joints: An Imaging Study in Subjects with TMD Cranio 2011;29:117-26
  8. Bertram S, Moriggl A, Rudisch A, et al. Structural Characteristics of Bilateral Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement Without Reduction and Osteoarthrosis Are Important Determinants of Horizontal Mandibular and Vertical Ramus Deficiency: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1898-1904
  9. Takahara N, Nakagawa S, Sumikura K, et al. Association of Temporomandibular Joint Pain According to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1848-55
  10. Bertram S, Rudisch A, Innerhofer K, et al. Diagnosing TMJ internal derangement and osteoarthritis with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:753-61
  11. Emshoff R, Rudisch A, Innerhofer K, et al. Temporomandibular joint internal derangement type III: relationship to magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement and osteoarthrosis. An intraindividual approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac