Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

The effect of intracameral bevacizumab on current hyphema

Pages
845–849
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The corneal staining scores were 0.85±0.35, 0.86±0.38, 0.14±0.38, and 0.14±0.38 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, andwere significantly higher for the groups receiving bevacizumab (p= 0.035).Conclusion: Intracameral bevacizumab may increase complications that related current hyphema.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intracameral bevacizumab on the current hyphema.Material and Methods: The animals were assigned to the following 4 groups; Group 1: One 2.5 mg bevacizumab injection to theanterior chamber; Group 2: One 1.25 mg bevacizumab injection to the anterior chamber; Group 3: One 1cc balanced salt solutioninjection to the anterior chamber; and Group 4: Untreated hyphema group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Intraocular pressures (IOP), hyphema resorption time, clot formation,peripheral synechia formation, and corneal staining were recorded.Results: IOP results were 26±1.2, 30±2.1, 24±2.9, and 22±0.0 mm Hg for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were significantlyhigher in group 2 than in the other groups (p= 0.001).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The corneal staining scores were 0.85±0.35, 0.86±0.38, 0.14±0.38, and 0.14±0.38 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, andwere significantly higher for the groups receiving bevacizumab (p= 0.035).Conclusion: Intracameral bevacizumab may increase complications that related current hyphema.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intracameral bevacizumab on the current hyphema.Material and Methods: The animals were assigned to the following 4 groups; Group 1: One 2.5 mg bevacizumab injection to theanterior chamber; Group 2: One 1.25 mg bevacizumab injection to the anterior chamber; Group 3: One 1cc balanced salt solutioninjection to the anterior chamber; and Group 4: Untreated hyphema group. Non-heparinized blood that obtained from the rabbit earwas used to fill the anterior chamber to create total hyphema. Intraocular pressures (IOP), hyphema resorption time, clot formation,peripheral synechia formation, and corneal staining were recorded.Results: IOP results were 26±1.2, 30±2.1, 24±2.9, and 22±0.0 mm Hg for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were significantlyhigher in group 2 than in the other groups (p= 0.001). Resorption times of hyphema were 13±2.2, 13±3.2, 9±1.7, and 9±1.6 days forgroups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were significantly longer for the groups receiving bevacizumab than for the others (p=0.018).The clot formation scores were 0.16±0.41, 0.14±0.38, 0.86±0.38, and 1.0±0.0 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and weresignificantly lower for the groups receiving bevacizumab than in the other groups (p= 0.002). The peripheral synechia formationscores were 0.0±0.0, 0.0±0.0, 0.43±0.53, and 0.50±0.54 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and were not significantly different (p=0.213). The corneal staining scores were 0.85±0.35, 0.86±0.38, 0.14±0.38, and 0.14±0.38 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, andwere significantly higher for the groups receiving bevacizumab (p= 0.035).Conclusion: Intracameral bevacizumab may increase complications that related current hyphema.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, N., AKBAS, S., AKPOLAT, N., PARLAKPİNAR, H., OZKAN, A. S. (2022). The effect of intracameral bevacizumab on current hyphema. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 845–849. https://ajindex.com/articles/446933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bansal S, Gunasekeran DV, Ang B, et al. Controversies in the pathophysiology and management of hyphema. Surv Ophthalmol 2016;61:297-308
  2. Walton W, Von Hagen S, Grigorian R, et al. Management of traumatic hyphema. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:297-334
  3. Bausback HJ. Clinical management of hyphema. Clin Eye Vis Care 1995;7:83-90
  4. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2335-42
  5. Adamis AP, Shima DT. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular health and disease. Retina 2005;25:111-8
  6. Yoganathan P, Deramo VA, Lai JC, et al. Visual improvement following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in exudative age related macular degeneration. Retina 2006;26:994-98
  7. Rich RM, Rosenfeld PJ, Puliafito CA, et al. Short-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2006;26:495-511
  8. Grisanti S, Biester S, Peters S, et al. Intracameral bevacizumab for iris rubeosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:158-60
  9. Bhagat PR, Agrawal KU, Tandel D. Study of the Effect of Injection Bevacizumab through Various Routes in Neovascular Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2016;10:39- 48
  10. Colak C, Parlakpınar H. [Animals in research: reporting In vivo experiments: ARRIVE guidelines-review]. J Turgut Ozal Med Cent 2012;19:128-31
  11. Zhou M, Xu X, Zhang X, et al. Clinical outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma valve implantation with or without intravitreal bevacizumab pretreatment for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:551-7
  12. Zhang H, Huang Z, Zou X, et al. Bevacizumab and woundhealing complications: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget 2016;7:82473-81
  13. Karcioglu ZA, Mullaney PB. Diagnosis and management of iris juvenile xanthogranuloma. J Paediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997;34:44-51
  14. Reggi JR, Hida RY, Hida MM, et al. Subconjunctival and topical application of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in rabbits. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2015;78:6-9
  15. Saxena R, Koudstaal P. Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;18:CD000187
  16. Gharaibeh A, Savage HI, Scherer RW, et al. Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema. Cochrane Database Syst R