Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6

Evaluation of the quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students

Pages
1108–1111
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant difference between the incisors and molars inthe maxillary and mandibular jaws (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the quality of root canal treatments performed by fifth year undergraduatedental students at the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University.Material and Methods: A total sample of 584 records of patients was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The technical quality of 523 root canal fillingsproviding criteria was evaluated according to the distance among the end of the filling and the radiographic apex, density of the fillingand the quality of the obturation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference between the incisors and molars inthe maxillary and mandibular jaws (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the quality of root canal treatments performed by fifth year undergraduatedental students at the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University.Material and Methods: A total sample of 584 records of patients was investigated. The technical quality of 523 root canal fillingsproviding criteria was evaluated according to the distance among the end of the filling and the radiographic apex, density of the fillingand the quality of the obturation. All examined periapical radiographs were taken during the procedure. A root canal with acceptablequality was defined as having acceptable length and density.Results: The highest quality in maxilla and mandible was found in incisors (64% and 64.8% respectively) and the lowest quality wasfound in molars (44.8% and 43.5% respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the incisors and molars inthe maxillary and mandibular jaws (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, F., AYDIN, U. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6, 1108–1111. https://ajindex.com/articles/446878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Daly RM, Elsner RJF, Allen PF, et al. Associations between self-reported dental status and diet. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:964-70
  2. Legan JJ, Brown CE. Instrumentation enhances today’s endodontic care. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1998;77:30-4, 37-8, 40-1
  3. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269–96
  4. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod 1979;5:83–90
  5. Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Sadiq J, et al. Technical standard of root canal treatment in an adult Scottish subpopulation. Br Dent J 1997;182:382–6
  6. Peak JD, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, et al. Endodontics: The outcome of root canal treatment. A retrospective study within the armed forces (Royal Air Force). BDJ 2001;190:140–4
  7. Lin LM, Pascon EA, Skribner J, et al. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic study of endodontic treatment failures. Oral Surgery Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:603–11
  8. Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G WK. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. Mater Sci Technol 2016;32:675–83
  9. Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy-a five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J 1993;26:321–33
  10. Cheung GS. Survival of first-time nonsurgical root canal treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital. Oral Surgery Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 596-604
  11. Chugal N, Clive J, Spångberg L. Endodontic infection: Some biologic and treatment factors associated with outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:81–90
  12. Kirkevang L-L, Orstavik D, Horsted-Bindslev P, et al. Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in a Danish population. Int Endod J 2000;33:509–15
  13. Barrieshi-Nusair K, Al-Omari M, Al-Hiyasat A. Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed by dental students at the Dental Teaching Center in Jordan. J Dent 2004;32:301–7
  14. Eleftheriadis GI, Lambrianidis TP. Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic errors in an undergraduate dental clinic. Int Endod J 2005;38:725–34
  15. Er Ö, Sagsen B, Maden M, et al. Radiographic technical quality of root fillings performed by dental students in Turkey. Int Endod J 2006;39:867–72
  16. Boucher Y, Matossian L, Rilliard F, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the prevalence and technical quality of root canal treatment in a French subpopul