Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 11

Gait abnormalities following slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Pages
2587–2591
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significant gait deviations were detected in SCFE patients such as (SCFEversus control group); Pelvis tilt range of motion (ROM) (3.5±1.5 - 2.3±0.5, p=

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the gait function following slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) with the healthycontrols.Material and Methods: We included 31 of 76 SCFE patients who were treated with in situ pinning between 2005 and 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Weexcluded patients with radiographic or clinical evidence of a contralateral slip, less than 2-years follow-up, incomplete epiphysealclosure, musculoskeletal abnormalities that can affect gait, avascular necrosis or chondrolysis and needed revision surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significant gait deviations were detected in SCFE patients such as (SCFEversus control group); Pelvis tilt range of motion (ROM) (3.5±1.5 - 2.3±0.5, p=
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the gait function following slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) with the healthycontrols.Material and Methods: We included 31 of 76 SCFE patients who were treated with in situ pinning between 2005 and 2013. Weexcluded patients with radiographic or clinical evidence of a contralateral slip, less than 2-years follow-up, incomplete epiphysealclosure, musculoskeletal abnormalities that can affect gait, avascular necrosis or chondrolysis and needed revision surgery. Tomeasure the patients’ quality of life and physical function Harris hip score and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instruments(PODCI) scores were used. All patients and control group were underwent whole-body motion analysis.Results: The mean age of patients when gait analyses were performed was 16.5 ± 2.5 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was27.78 ± 5.6 kg/m2. A control group was formed from volunteers whose mean age was 17.84 ± 1.47 years that ranged between 16and 20 years, with a mean BMI of 27.72 ± 2.61 kg/m2. Significant gait deviations were detected in SCFE patients such as (SCFEversus control group); Pelvis tilt range of motion (ROM) (3.5±1.5 - 2.3±0.5, p=

🔖

Cite This Article

BENG, K., UÇPINAR, H. (2022). Gait abnormalities following slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 11, 2587–2591. https://ajindex.com/articles/446843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Herring JA, Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis, John Anthony Herring. Tachdjian’s Pediatric Orthopaedics 5th Edition, Philadelphia, Elsevier-Saunders 2013; 630-54
  2. Seller K, Wild A, Westhoff B, et al. Clinical outcome after transfixation of the epiphysis with Kirschner wires in unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Int Orthop 2006;30:342-7
  3. Bellemans J, Fabry G, Molenaers G, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a long-term follow-up, with special emphasis on the capacities for remodeling. J Pediatr Orthop B 1996;5:151-7
  4. Seller K, Wild A, Westhoff B, et al. Radiological evaluation of unstable (acute) slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by pinning with Kirschner wires. J Pediatr Orthop B 2006;15:328-34
  5. Song KM, Halliday S, Reilly C, et al. Gait abnormalities following slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2004;24:148-55
  6. Westhoff B, Ruhe K, Weimann-Stahlschmidt K, et al. The gait function of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in patients after growth arrest and its correlation with the clinical outcome. Int Orthop 2012;36:1031-38
  7. Westhoff B, Schröder K, Weimann-Stahlschmidt K, et al. Radiological outcome and gait function of SCFE patients after growth arrest. J Child Orthop 2013;7:507-12
  8. Sangeux M, Passmore E, Gomez G, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis, fixation by single screw in situ: A kinematic and radiographic study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29:523–30
  9. Ounpuu S, Davis R, DeLuca P. Joint kinetics: methods, interpretation and treatment decision-making in children with cerebral palsy and myelomeningocele. Gait Posture 1996;4:62-78
  10. Brisson N, Lamontagne M, Kennedy MJ, et al. The effects of cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery on lower-extremity gait biomechanics. Gait Posture 2013;37:258-63
  11. Alradwan H, Khan M, Grassby MHS, et al. Gait and lower extremity kinematic analysis as an outcome measure after femoroacetabular impingement surgery. Arthroscopy 2015;31:339-44
  12. Kennedy MJ, Lamontagne M, Beaulé PE. Femoroacetabular impingement alters hip and pelvic biomechanics during gait Walking biomechanics of FAI. Gait Posture 2009;30:41-4
  13. Rab GT. The geometry of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: implications for movement, impingement, and corrective osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19:419-24. 14
  14. Diamond LE, Wrigley TV, Bennell KL, Hinman RS, O’Donnell J, Hodges PW. Hip joint biomechanics during gait in people with and without symptomatic femoroacetab