Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Determination of cut-off values of tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment and fall risk questionnaire in older adults individuals with cognitive impairment

Pages
204–208
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is suggested that these tests used in the clinic should be examined considering the risk of falling in older adults with mild cognitive function.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study was planned to determine cut-off values of the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) and the Self-Assessment Fall Risk Questionnaire (FRQ) in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.Material and Methods: This study included a total of 213 individuals aged 65 years and over in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These individuals were divided into two groups according to Mini Mental Test (MMT) scores: 116 individuals with an MMT score of 18-23 (mild cognitive impairment) and 97 individuals with an MMT score of 24 or more (normal cognitive function).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is suggested that these tests used in the clinic should be examined considering the risk of falling in older adults with mild cognitive function.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study was planned to determine cut-off values of the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) and the Self-Assessment Fall Risk Questionnaire (FRQ) in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.Material and Methods: This study included a total of 213 individuals aged 65 years and over in the study. These individuals were divided into two groups according to Mini Mental Test (MMT) scores: 116 individuals with an MMT score of 18-23 (mild cognitive impairment) and 97 individuals with an MMT score of 24 or more (normal cognitive function). Balance and gait performance was assessed by the POMA, the fall risk self-assessment by older adult susing a FRQ.Results: In Older Adults with mild cognitive function, the clinical cut-off points for the POMA and FRQ were determined according to ROC curve analysis. The clinical cut-off point for the POMA was determined as 15.5 points; and 15.5 points or more in the POMA were considered normal with a 95% confidence level. The clinical cut-off point for the FRQ was determined as 4.5 points; and 4.5 points or less in the FRQ were considered normal with a 95% confidence level.Conclusions: We think that it is important to take the values obtained in the present study into account in interpreting the above-mentioned commonly used tests when cognitive status is considered related to falling. Therefore, it is suggested that these tests used in the clinic should be examined considering the risk of falling in older adults with mild cognitive function.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERTEL, M., BEZGİN, S., SAKİZLİ, E., DEMİRCİ, C. S. (2022). Determination of cut-off values of tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment and fall risk questionnaire in older adults individuals with cognitive impairment. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 204–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/446776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Christofoletti G, Oliani MM, Gobbi S, et al. Effects of motor intervention in elderly patients with dementia: an analysis of randomized controlled trials. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2007;23:149-54
  2. Yu F, Evans LK, Sullivan Marx EM. Functional outcomes for older adults with cognitive impairment in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:1599-606
  3. Sturnieks DL, George R, Lord SR. Balance disorders in the elderly. Neurophysiol Clin 2008;38:467-78
  4. Shimada H, Uchiyama Y, Kakurai S. Specific effects of balance and gait exercises on physical function among the frail elderly. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:472-9
  5. Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Geron. 1994;49:M72-84, 6. Iinattiniemi S, Jokelainen J, Luukinen H. Falls risk among a very old home-dwelling population. Scand J Prim Health Care 2009;27:25-30
  6. Pluijm SM, Smit JH, Tromp EA, et al. A risk profile for identifying community dwelling elderly with a high risk of recurrent falling: results of a 3 year prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:417-25
  7. Sieri T, Beretta G. Fall risk assessment in very old males and females living in nursing homes. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:718-23
  8. Blankevoort CG, van Heuvelen MJ, Boersma F, et al. Review of effects of physical activity on strength, balance, mobility and adl performance in elderly subjects with dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2010;30:392-402
  9. Topper AK, Maki BE, Holliday PJ. Are Activity-Based Assessments of Balance and Gait in the Elderly Predictive of Risk of Falling and/or Type of Fall? J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:479-87
  10. Verghese J, Buschke H, Viola L, et al. Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1572-6
  11. Alexander NB, Goldberg A. Clinical gait and stepping performance measures in older adults. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2006;3:20-28
  12. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986;34:119-26
  13. Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, et al. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports and Exerc 2001;33:1126-41
  14. Yücel SD, Şahin F, Doğu B, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment I. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2012;9:149-59
  15. Rubenstein LZ,