PFDI-20 score improved significantly after the ASC and SSLF (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the objective and the subjective results of native tissue sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) operation for the treatment of vaginal cuff prolapse (VCP).Material and Methods: 25 patients who underwent native tissue SSLF and 20 patients who underwent mesh ASC procedure for VCP were evaluated with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and pelvic floor distress inventory-20 (PFDI-20) before the surgery and 12 months after surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Demographic data, intra- and postoperative complications, operation duration and hospital stay were also recorded.Results: No difference was detected between SSLF and ASC in terms of objective success rate (88% vs. 95%; p=0.617).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PFDI-20 score improved significantly after the ASC and SSLF (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the objective and the subjective results of native tissue sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) operation for the treatment of vaginal cuff prolapse (VCP).Material and Methods: 25 patients who underwent native tissue SSLF and 20 patients who underwent mesh ASC procedure for VCP were evaluated with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and pelvic floor distress inventory-20 (PFDI-20) before the surgery and 12 months after surgery. The patients were asked about surgical satisfaction, postoperatively. Demographic data, intra- and postoperative complications, operation duration and hospital stay were also recorded.Results: No difference was detected between SSLF and ASC in terms of objective success rate (88% vs. 95%; p=0.617). PFDI-20 score improved significantly after the ASC and SSLF (p
🔖
Cite This Article
KOLELİ, I., YILMAZ, E. (2022). Vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal cuff prolapse: A retrospective study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 398–403. https://ajindex.com/articles/446761
Glazener C, Constable L, Hemming C, et al. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016;17:441
Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:579-85
Slopnick EA, Petrikovets A, Sheyn D, et al. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample. Int Urogynecol J 2018;3
Betschart C, Cervigni M, Ortiz OC, et al. management of apical compartment prolapse ( uterine and vault prolapse ): a figo working group report. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:507-13
Clemons JL, Weinstein M, Guess MK, et al. Impact of the 2011 FDA transvaginal mesh safety update on augs members’ use of synthetic mesh and biologic grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013;19:191-8
Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1418-22
Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:20-6
Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP. Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: Success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:612-6
Ng M, Han HC, Ng C, et al. Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse. Singapore Med J 2004;45:475-81
Marcickiewicz J, Kjöllesdal M, Engh ME, et al. Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:733-8
Sze EH, Kohli N, Miklos JR, et al. Original Article A Retrospective Comparison of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy with Burch Colposuspension versus Sacrospinous Fixation with Transvaginal Needle Suspension for the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse and Coexisting Stress Incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999;10:390-3
Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and met