As a result of these assessments,the patients whose donor sites were left to heal by secondary intention were categorized as the control group and those whosewounds were packed with OGS as the experimental group.Results: When the VAS scores of the 22 patients, 14 of whom were female and 8 males, were examined, no statistically significantdifference between females and males was determined (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of Oxidized Gelatin Sponge (OGS) usage in the donor site on pain during thepost-operation period through the VAS form administered to the patients.Material and Methods: The study was carried out by using the VAS forms filled in on the 2nd and 7th days following the operationby the 34 patients who had undergone Free Gingival Graft (FGG) operation performed by the same periodontologist in the Faculty ofDentistry, Harran University, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The information on whether the wound that formed in the donor site was packed primarily and, ifpacked, what material was used was obtained from the periodontologist who treated the patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of these assessments,the patients whose donor sites were left to heal by secondary intention were categorized as the control group and those whosewounds were packed with OGS as the experimental group.Results: When the VAS scores of the 22 patients, 14 of whom were female and 8 males, were examined, no statistically significantdifference between females and males was determined (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of Oxidized Gelatin Sponge (OGS) usage in the donor site on pain during thepost-operation period through the VAS form administered to the patients.Material and Methods: The study was carried out by using the VAS forms filled in on the 2nd and 7th days following the operationby the 34 patients who had undergone Free Gingival Graft (FGG) operation performed by the same periodontologist in the Faculty ofDentistry, Harran University, Turkey. The information on whether the wound that formed in the donor site was packed primarily and, ifpacked, what material was used was obtained from the periodontologist who treated the patients. As a result of these assessments,the patients whose donor sites were left to heal by secondary intention were categorized as the control group and those whosewounds were packed with OGS as the experimental group.Results: When the VAS scores of the 22 patients, 14 of whom were female and 8 males, were examined, no statistically significantdifference between females and males was determined (p
🔖
Cite This Article
ÜNER, D. D., İZOL, B. S. (2022). Evaluation of the effect of oxidized gelatin sponge on pain level in the donor area in free gingival graft operations. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 334–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/446595
Cohen RE. The American Academy of Periodontology 1999 Annual Report 2005;70:1575
Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:220-5
Khosya B, Cg D. Original Article Etiology and Severity of Different Grades of. Natl J Med Res 2014;4:189-92
Chambrone LA, Chambrone L. Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Treatment of Multiple Recession-Type Defects. J Periodontol 2006;77:909- 16
Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann R V., et al. Gingival Recession: Epidemiology and Risk Indicators in a Representative Urban Brazilian Population. J Periodontol 2005;75:1377-86
Tugnait A, Clerehugh V. Gingival recession - Its significance and management. J Dent 2001;29:381- 94
Goyal L, Gupta ND, Gupta N, et al. Free Gingival Graft as a Single Step Procedure for Treatment of Mandibular Miller Class I and II Recession Defects. World J Plast Surg 2019;8:12–7. 8
Patil Veena A BN. Free Gingival Autograft: A Case Report. Int J Dent Clin 2010;2:42-6
Popova C, Kotsilkov K, Doseva V. Mucogingival Surgery With Free Gingival Graft ( Strip Technique ) for Augmentation of the Attached Gingival Tissues: Report of Three Cases 2007;13 10. Hou L-T, Yan J-J, Liu C-M, et al. Treatment of the gingival recession -literature review of current progress. Chin Dent J 2005;24:71-8
Del Pizzo M, Modica F, Bethaz N, et al. The connective tissue graft: A comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site - A preliminary study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:848-54
Rossmann JA, Rees TD. A Comparative Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in the Management of Soft Tissue Graft Donor Site Bleeding. J Periodontol 2005;70:1369-75
Üner D, Izol B. Evaluation of the Effect of Platelet‑Rich Fibrin on Palatal Donor Area Pain After Harvesting a Free Gingival Graft. Int J Adv Res 2018;6:292-6
Mannava Y, Nayak SU, Kamath DG, et al. Plateletrich fibrin as palatal bandage: A case report. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev 2018;9:65-8
Bahammam MA. Effect of platelet-rich fibrin palatal bandage on pain scores and wound healing after free gingival graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:3179-88
Kumar A, Gupta G. Palatal bandage. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:684
Mannai C, Leake D, Pizzoferrato A, et al. Histologic evaluation of purified bovine tendon collagen sponge in tooth extraction sites in dogs. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61:315-23