SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

The prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in 9-16 years old children

Ahmet ARAS
Mehmet Sinan DOĞAN
Pages
297–300
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relationshipbetween gender and hypodontia was examined by chi-square test, and the result was statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Hypodontia is one of the most common dentofacial malformations that affect individuals, both aesthetically and functionally.Hypodontia or congenitally missing teeth is among dental anomalies with different prevalence in each region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed toevaluate the prevalence of congenital permanent teeth deficiency according to gender, age and number of missing teeth in childrenaged 9-16 years.Material and Methods: In this study, hypodontia cases were examined retrospectively from the panoramic radiographs of patientsaged 9-16 years who applied to the Department of Pedodontics of Harran University Faculty of Dentistry between 2018-2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relationshipbetween gender and hypodontia was examined by chi-square test, and the result was statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Hypodontia is one of the most common dentofacial malformations that affect individuals, both aesthetically and functionally.Hypodontia or congenitally missing teeth is among dental anomalies with different prevalence in each region. This study aimed toevaluate the prevalence of congenital permanent teeth deficiency according to gender, age and number of missing teeth in childrenaged 9-16 years.Material and Methods: In this study, hypodontia cases were examined retrospectively from the panoramic radiographs of patientsaged 9-16 years who applied to the Department of Pedodontics of Harran University Faculty of Dentistry between 2018-2019. Age,gender, count and number of missing teeth, jaw and side of the missing tooth were recorded. Descriptive statistical analysis andChi-square test were used for statistical analysis of the obtained data.Results: Of the 1036 patients included in our study, 52% (539) were male, and 48% (497) were female. The age average of the patients,whose radiographies were evaluated, was 11. Congenital tooth deficiency (hypodontia) was found in 68 patients, i.e. 6.6% of patients. Atotal of 123 teeth were missing in 68 patients. Twenty-four of the patients with hypodontia were male, and 44 were female. The relationshipbetween gender and hypodontia was examined by chi-square test, and the result was statistically significant (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, A., DOĞAN, M. S. (2022). The prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in 9-16 years old children. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 297–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/446539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Fekonja A. Hypodontia prevalence over four decades in a Slovenian population. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:37-43
  2. Gomes RR, da Fonseca JAC, Paula LM, et al. Prevalence of hypodontia in orthodontic patients in Brasilia, Brazil. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:302-6
  3. Endo T, Ozoe R, Yoshino S, et al. Hypodontia patterns and variations in craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2006;76:996- 1003
  4. Sheikhi M, Sadeghi MA, Ghorbanizadeh S. Prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in Iran. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:105-11
  5. De Coster PJ, Marks LA, Martens LC, et al. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009;38:1-17
  6. Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, et al. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral y Cir Bucal 2010;15:797-801
  7. Chung CJ, Han J-H, Kim K-H. The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Dis 2008;14:620-5
  8. Goya HA, Tanaka S, Maeda T, et al. An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients. J Oral Sci 2008;50:143-50
  9. Amini F, Rakhshan V, Babaei P. Prevalence and pattern of hypodontia in the permanent dentition of 3374 Iranian orthodontic patients. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:245-50
  10. Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): A review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12:1-13
  11. Topkara A, Sari Z. Prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in a Turkish orthodontic patient population: results from a large academic cohort. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011;12:123-7
  12. Kokich VG, Kokich VO. Congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: clinical options. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:437-44
  13. Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E, et al. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod 2014;41:299-316
  14. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FPGM, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:217-26
  15. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, et al. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011;53:231- 8
  16. Bhardwaj VK, Veeresha KL, Sharma KR. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among 16 and 17 year-old school-going children in Shimla city, Himachal Pr